No actually, it was the subject you started. And because you started on that subject it is the subject of the conversation. Donāt try to gaslight me, I was following the whole thread.
You answer kittyās assertions which was directed at both soul whom was talking about cezol. There was no indication that Kitt was referring to the spam issue you jeep trying to justify it as. Kitt was defending cezol btw.
Clearly your opinion is that they were insults and against the code of conduct, but clearly in his opinion they were not against the code of conduct or he wouldnāt have posted them.
How is that any different from legitimately feeling something is trolling, spamming, or in bad faith and flagging it?
Youāre sitting here trying to shame others for liking a post from someone who thinks certain types of threads are in bad faith (spam/trolling/etc) saying that those bad faith posts should be flagged, yet you admit to flagging something that in your opinion is not acceptable.
Why is it okay for you to act on what you believe is against the code of conduct but itās not acceptable for others to do so?
Are you putting in a lot of effort trying to police the forums or arenāt you? Because in some areas you do but others you donāt? But then try to shame others for not putting in as much work as you in the areas you do spend time on but then are very relaxed on the obvious other areas to pay attention to
At the end of the day Iām not policing anything. Iām just saying that I donāt like the idea of people defending a post to me that seems to be advocating flag abuse.