Unlocking Unobtainable Appearances in Class for Retail?

Interesting thought for some.

No.

1 Like

Just because theyā€™re linked doesnā€™t make it a side game. No one wants people coming in to play for transmog gear and quitting. Itā€™s a good thing blizzard already shot this down.

3 Likes

Bad idea. This has been talked about at length in the threads that have already been linked. Your dismissive attitude doesnā€™t give your ā€œargumentā€ any more weight no matter how much you think it does.

The whole ā€œItā€™s for the long-term health of the gameā€ schtick has also been addressed and you choose to ignore it. Again, this adds no weight to your ā€œargumentā€.

Classicā„¢ wonā€™t have transferability to retail. Classicā„¢ doesnā€™t need transferability to retail. You are wrong and your suggestion is bad.

https ://www.pcgamer.com/this-is-how-blizzard-plans-to-finally-bring-back-vanilla-wow-servers/

That article includes this quote from J. Allen Brack:

"If millions of people show up and play for years, thatā€™s awesome. And if just tens of people show up and play for years, weā€™re fine either way. "

:cocktail:

3 Likes

In another news, words donā€™t mean what they mean. Donā€™t say you want it to be transferable and not transferable in the same sentence.

Nope. Just look at Ionā€™s reaction when someone describes BFA as ā€œthe real gameā€ at the 1:00 mark.

People are going to quit anyway eventually. You are just gate keeping

The suggestion is not bad because you disagree. Also it is not solely on keeping the game healthy, itā€™s also to improve retail

No, the suggestion is bad because Blizzard disagrees. AND has stated as such at multiple levels.

Keep moving those goalpoasts.

:cocktail:

2 Likes

Ion hasnā€™t cared about anything except his own opinions. He canā€™t answer and question without dancing around like itā€™s 1999. When you said transferable my first though was trading.

Iā€™m sure if you were posting on your real account and not a throw away one, weā€™d see some transmogged characters.

:stuck_out_tongue:

Ah, so you are a blizzard fanboy who believes they can do no wrong. I honestly donā€™t care for anything has trivial has ā€œgoalpostsā€

Didnā€™t you catch his memo though? Transmogs are for people who never played has dolls when they were children

I find that a lot of people who hate on transmog are themselves using transmog =P

1 Like

Just because classic is going to die eventually has absolutely nothing to do with having classic items cross over to retail.

And no amount of emoji spam will give your posts and wait either. I dismissed your opinion because Blizzard isnā€™t perfect, no one is. To cling to them is showing me you cannot think for yourself

Not gonna completely deny your idea, but I personally donā€™t want people playing classic who feel forced to.

Golden guns in OW competitive is a good example of why this only dilutes and deteriorates the integrity of the gameplay.

Classic dying off sounds scary, but Iā€™m optimistic. Server mergers are ideal to me (especially over sharding,) but hopefully that isnā€™t necessary for a long while.

Not if they do something about it. Iā€™m suggesting one think to a sea of possible answers

So like my defias armor that was made available? Or my scarlet crusade set or my blood knight tabard? Those were all made easily available. At least my suggestion still makes many of those coveted items hard to obtain.

1 Like

[You and the OP] - ā€œThe Earth is flat.ā€

[Practically everyone else] - Provides mountain of evidence refuting the claim, including pictures and science

[You and the OP] - LOL Science has been wrong before. I win!!

:cocktail:

1 Like

I have never cared about golden guns. If people want to grind hell for a cosmetic they can earn then be my guest. And Server merging is something that would kill the community

Well, like, that just your opinion maaaan.

2 Likes