Twinks still a HUGE problem

PVP Battlegrounds
373

Same here. Another reason why I don’t think it’s a HUGE issue now.

4 Likes
374

“Full of” is a vague term. Do they mean there are many on each team? I can agree to that. Then again, I would see a couple on each team, which some may think is too many. I’ve seen some say that 1 is too many. I can see their points objectively.

375

Full denotes just what it says - full. My cup being full of coffee doesn’t mean 1/4 to anyone. It means full. When someone says full to me, I’m taking them to mean what they say, not some twisted version where full means 1 or 2 on a field of 10.

4 Likes
376

If you’re going verbatim but I’ve seen “full of” or like terms used out of context many times.

377

With the current state of the game, if one “twink” was ruining an entire other team’s day, then I don’t know what to say. It’s easier to take them down now than it ever has been. Even those filthy grandfathered geared ones.

8 Likes
378

There ya go. So when someone says “full of” and I know they are talking crap because I am literally in those brackets every. damn. night. it’s not just “out of context”, it’s flat out bs.

3 Likes
379

How silly. 1 twink needs 3 - 4 people to focus him just to keep him out of the game. Which means the game turns into a 6 v. 9. Are the other 9 enemies idiots? Do they not know how to play objectives? Are they afk?

True they aren’t PvP gods, but let’s not pretend they can’t turn the tide of a battle.

4 Likes
380

To be fair, that happens on both sides. I can look at things objectively while some are too keen on only seeing what they want to see while ignoring things they want to believe are false.

Then again, you also have to remember where we are right now. We’re in the official forums. Things are taken out of context, exaggerated or even flat-out lied about and I’ve seen it from both sides. That’s one reason I stopped even talking to some people, because they’ve proven to be compulsive liars.

3 Likes
381

Depends on the players. 2 is enough

2 Likes
382

2 Good players. 3-4 average players. When dealing with variables you always go by the average.

383

More then enough my 113 monk a few months ago soloed a 119 twink hunter. but since alot of people don’t even use interrupts of course they will die. then they make these threads XDDD

3 Likes
384

Completely agree here. It’s insane how much this happens. Not only the liars but the overly emotional as well for me. It’s a game, I can’t relate to the whole drama scene at all.

I majorly dislike lies and truth stretching. :roll_eyes:

2 Likes
385

Pretty sure he means me, and I haven’t lied about a thing…

2 Likes
386

Hmm, don’t think I’ve ever seen you outright lie about something. :thinking:

1 Like
387

My lvl 7 shadow priest beat a lvl 119 twink too.

2 Likes
388

I don’t believe you.

I do, however, believe Oak. Know why? Because of the way secondary stat scaling works. Your Legion gear has secondary stat advantage over leveling quest gear.

1 Like
389

Don’t worry bro 1 day I am sure you will be good enough to solo 1

1 Like
390

No i’m telling you. I already did. I have just as much proof as you.

391

They make it seem its impossible. is it harder? sure no denying that but if your good enough it can be done np

392

I just roll my eyes at it. Some thrive off that because they’re so in need of the attention. It sucks when you do your best to avoid it but it seems to follow you around.

But on the topic, that’s why I’m in the position I am. I’m neutral, even though I’ve tilted towards the support side since I’ve seen people who just want the playstyle gone completely and I don’t believe that’s fair. However, there are few and you seem to be one who is willing to be objective and not insult someone just for seeing things the exact way you do.

Don’t take the bait…

1 Like