The entire campaign about “vote kick is abuse” comes down to this. There are people who are upset about, and misunderstand, the Social Contract. I suspect at this point it is purposeful. As in, if they can get in trouble in-game for using profanity and insults, then they want to take it to the extreme and pretend that nobody can ever have a bad day in game - therefore kicking is “abuse”. They pretend that Blizzard is somehow violating their own rules by allowing players to remove a person from a group. Highly false, but that is the argument that they are pushing.
Notice the most vocal are NOT INTERESTED in talking about actual reductions in the duration of the debuff, or making sure the cooldown timer on kicking works. They don’t want solutions. They want to focus on the whole kick being “toxic” as a concept.
The funniest part is that the Social Contract just restates the Code of Conduct we have always had. It was not against the rules to kick 10 years ago, and it is not against the rules now. Nothing that is in the Social Contract is different than it was in 2004.
-The Social Contract is two parts. Part one is NOT ENFORCEABLE - that is the part that says be nice and you will have a better game experience. Part 2 is a restatement of the core EULA/TOS from 2004. No profanity, masked profanity, slurs, insults, etc. That you have to follow the code of conduct.
Part 1: Suggestions to play nicely and get along. There are no options to report for these things because they are just SUGGESTIONS.
Part 2: RULES we have to follow. See the section in RED brackets. These are based on the 2004 EULA/TOS and the current Code of Conduct. Nothing has changed at all.
2004 TOU/EULA
Original User Manual from 2004 https://bnetcmsus-a.akamaihd.net/cms/template_resource/LO0VQ46XB1281555957773363.pdf - which has the EULA at the end. It points to the requirements for accepting Terms of Use with the website for it. I selected the first archived Wayback Machine TOU for WoW from 2004.
https://web.archive.org/web/20041217101250/http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/legal/termsofuse.shtml
I have copied out the relevant sections. Yes, it included hateful names and speech as well as profanity, masked profanity, spam, etc.
When engaging in Chat in World of Warcraft, or otherwise utilizing World of Warcraft, you may not:
- (i) Transmit or post sexually explicit images or other content or language which in the sole discretion of Blizzard Entertainment is deemed to be offensive; nor shall you transmit any unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable content or language, nor may you use a misspelling or an alternative spelling to circumvent the content and language restrictions listed above;
- (vii) Harass, threaten, stalk, embarrass or cause distress, unwanted attention or discomfort to another user of World of Warcraft or other person or entity; or
Things that are part of normal gameplay using the tools of the game that the Devs put in does not “violate” any of those rules despite attempts to act like they do. They even put in a special articles for PvP and for Kicks because people tried to argue “but I am uncomfortable make it stop”. The intent of the rules is to prevent social abuse from other players. Not to make every aspect of the gameplay happy.
This is for people who tried to argue PvP that they willingly opt into is somehow “abuse” or against the rules.