You level Ally or horde? I spammed a million dungeons leveling my prot warr on Ally so who knows, I may have tanked for you lol.
Well the main posters representing the anti lfd’ers in these forums are zippy and Bloom. Not sending thier best.
5 Likes
Why I give them some credit. Ballsy move to NOT put in several things that would most likely make money. the dude has guts.
Catch to that is…when you make a call like that someone on the executive floor is still expecting returns.
No lfd, no acct transder, no faction change, no racial change. these 4 combined would make say 1 million (purely made up simple number for example).
Retail or even old data from wrath the first time…will give a data point set to give an idea of potential money here.
not having them…also needs to make that same money if not more all the same.
you have yet to make any connection between RDF and a bad community. Just made up rants.
1 Like
I have both those trolls on ignore. The only time I see their posts are when someone quotes them. You’ve got zippy trying to argue that spamming the lfg channel and paying to join dungeon groups is engaging. How does anyone take that nonsense seriously?
Ziryus has that guy pegged: he’s just full of 
. I’m convinced he wants Wrath to fail and that’s why he’s so anti-lfd…because why else would you be? Removing it only benefits bots and boosters.
5 Likes
Thats a blizzard call.
Like them putting what sounds like Retail level inspired lfg. If not straight up copy pasta of the code. I will assume UI devs will make it look organic to the wrath classic UI ofc.
and a great reason for more RMT activity. Great job!!!
3 Likes
Umm, so, when I go to complete a dungeon, the successful completion of said dungeon is literally my only goal.
I’m sorry, but did you just say that picking our party members is part of the adventure? Have you not noticed how most groups form these days?
“LFM for Slave Pens”
“inv” - Invited
Repeat until filled.
I don’t sit them down and interview them, asking them where they see themselves in five years.
4 Likes
The funniest thing in this whole argument are the “classic community purist” (who always say go back to retail as an insult) wanting lfd gone but replaced with an actual retail feature. Removing actual classic features and shoehorning retail ones in “is the spirit of classic” apparently LOL
6 Likes
When Ion put flying back in WOD, I can be pretty sure he was told to “fix the sub loss problem” if you make it painful enough, they will deal with it.
1 Like
They say it without any sense of hypocrisy or irony. It’s incredible.
2 Likes
Really you don’t? When I make groups I interview each person and ask them questions like “what level do you see your self being in five years?” And let them know before I invite they will be subjected to a wow background check to make sure they were never convicted of ninja looting or other wow felonies.
2 Likes
That must be why I have such a problem getting into groups. The back ground check. I knew it had something to do with me shrinking the people in my groups and coming back to haunt me.
1 Like
Those wow felonies will haunt you for life when you are trying to join groups. Also make sure to lay off the noggenfogger before applying for your pre grouping drug test or you will test positive for just about all the wow drugs.
MG alliance and WRA horde. with some horde on illidan. Never know which AH will have a killer deal lol. So more than 1 always a good thing for mog/mount deal hunts lol.
1 Like
Nah, I think they’re just too arrogant to accept the possibility that they’re wrong. They think they’ve seen it from every angle and their way is the best, even if nobody - literally nobody - else wants it that way.
They seem to really care about their version of the game, but are just way too dismissive of the hurdles that other players might have to overcome.
I’ve only got three people on ignore, Bloomberg is one of them, Zippy hasn’t made the cut yet. They still make some pretty strong arguments.
1 Like
Opps. A tad too late.
2 Likes
Bloomberg lol. I’ll start calling him that
At the end of the day if they decided to put RDF back in to WOTLK-C, I would still play it, and likely would not really complain.
It’s not accurate to define me as “anti-RDF” as much as I am “pro-no-RDF”.
I wasn’t making topics prior to the announcement of it’s removal for it to get removed. I had no vested interest. Since Blizzard played their hand and made it known that they share a page of my book on what Classic should be, I’m going to show my support and defend their decision. That’s really all.
1 Like
I don’t like to Beetlejuice anybody so I have to come up with something else to refer to them by. I’ve also used Bloomingdale’s.