Tell me you don’t know how the law works.
I would love for it to be explained.
So far, no one is able to contradict me within this hypothetical.
Except that is not true. They can pull the person over based on the 911 report and run a sobriety test. The person does not have to swerve in front of the cop again.
Now, people calling 911 to falsely report things can result in those persons being prosecuted for abusing 911 resources. So 911 calls are generally taken seriously and officers sent to investigate - which includes pulling over suspected drivers, or stopping suspicious persons in a neighborhood.
I see what analogy you are trying to make, but it just does not hold up here.
If they fail a sobriety test, that is a future action they would be in trouble for.
Because they had not failed it before at the time of the call.
They are not being arrested because you saw them swerving. They are being arrested for failing the sobriety test.
1 Like
the caller described the vehicle as a 1980’s model, blue van and said it was heading northbound on Route 99. An officer in the vicinity then intercepted the van and stopped it. The driver was Susan Wells.
The officer determined that Wells seemed to be under the influence, although he did not notice any problem with her driving. He then arrested her. An inventory search of her van revealed things and several syringes. Wells then tested positive
There is no future actions here, he found the car and immediately stopped it, hello?
How did we even get here? Nobody’s getting arrested for tanking drunk.
1 Like
Murder, kidnapping, assault, etc.
Cops don’t have to see any of that happen live.
Also cops arrest you, the court punishes you. Cops will always arest you with reasonable suspicion and let the courts fogure out the verdict.
Again, you have no idea how law enforcement works.
Yes, the call allowed them to stop the vehicle.
Then they were arrested for issues, while related, not being the point of the call.
Not what is being talked about in this hypothetical.
This is about seeing a driver swerve. And being arrested solely based on that phone call.
1 Like
We got here because someone can’t handle a perfect analogy that describes the situation with blizzard banning players based on reports instead of independent action
Blizzard bans based on their logs. They investigate chat based on reports. Done.
/closethread
3 Likes
Except you are refusing to see that if you report a person in game, they see the exact thing
Yes, they arent seeing how that is drastically different.
“based on future actions” implies they wait for something to happen and then act. They did not do that here. You have no point here
1 Like
This thread goes all the way down the rabbit hole.
Holy cow.
2 Likes
The rules of law enforcement apply to all interactions dude. Again, you are clueless on this.
Sunday! Sunday! Sunday!
Such as it ever was.
3 Likes
So if I call in and use your license plate, they will show up and give you a ticket?
No other questions asked.
Just a ticket. Nothing else looked into?
1 Like
This thread is so derailed I don’t know that it’s ever been on rails anymore.
2 Likes
Meh, the original railing was silly anyways.
1 Like
Some might say, goofy, even
2 Likes
Except that isn’t how it works all of the time. You can mass report someone and something will happen to them. Tell me i’m wrong.