The WoW trinity

[Pyromor-shandris (Pyromor)]

Your barking the wrong tree it is clear you don’t.

[anon30972072]

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

You do know what a concubine is, right?

Do you?

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

the concubines in the Black Temple need to go for obvious reasons. Sex slaves aren’t very cool.

Because that’s not it.

[Moothas-dunemaul]

More delusional, unrealistic demands.

[Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord]

@Pyromor-shandris

Do you really,they are married ,omg they are married ,do you get this?

@Pyromor-shandris

Your barking the wrong tree it is clear you don’t

concubine

a woman with whom a man cohabits without being married

• one having a recognized social status in a household below that of a wife

• a mistress

Definition of CONCUBINE

You literally don’t know what a concubine is.

[anon30972072]

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

You literally don’t know what a concubine is.

You just posted the actual definition showing you don’t know what it is either. lmao

[Pourrire-grobbulus]

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

I haven’t been on the forum in about a week, stop lying.

Succubus is sexist please remove/ incubus incoming

Edit: I would like to give credit to the first person on this thread to suggest the compromise. Rorrand! UPDATE: Blizzard has given their answer this matter. There will be an incubus glyph added to create parity. I believe that is a direct result of the discussion we’ve had over the past few months, as that was the most popular suggestion many of you had. I will include a link to the article where Blizzard addresses this. We did it fam. We did it. Love, Lokath As the title suggests, the…

Please don't ruin skimpy mogs

I am a bit concerned that a side effect of the recently lawsuits may be that skimpy armor on female characters gets toned down. Just make male mogs more skimpy to be fair. Plenty of women do like skimpy mogs.

In Game Inappropriate Content - Violence and Sexism Towards Women

Good afternoon, I have been keenly following the recent events surrounding Activision-Blizzard and read in the recent release from the World of Warcraft team: “While we turn to our team for guidance in our internal work to protect marginalized groups and hold accountable those who threaten them, we also want to take immediate action in Azeroth to remove references that are not appropriate for our world. This work has been underway, and you will be seeing several such changes to both Shadowland…

Just had to go past page 1 of General Discussion.

[Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord]

Cool. Those people aren’t me. I wasn’t anywhere near this forum yesterday, or for almost a week.

[Warpstone-norgannon (Warpstone)]

Please highlight where that definition has the words “sex” or “Slave”

[Pyromor-shandris (Pyromor)]

They all are married ,do you know what you are talking about.You have you main wife that controls the house and the lesser wives. You need to read up on cultures before hammering this.

[Atalanta-trollbane (Atalanta)]

Anuke! You can’t just ask people why they’re killing them!

[Kainas-silver-hand (Kainas)]

Stop trying to be an opportunist to use tragedy to push your crap.

This is the victims moment, not yours.

---

1. No. This infringes on other people’s rights and personal choices. You do not have to wear skimpy armor if you do not wish to. That is as far as your choices go. If Blizzard wants to make such items, that is their creative right. Not yours.

---

2. People have wanted the pants version in game for years. Again, this is a case of personal choice. Add glyph variants for those who want it or perhaps overhaul Warlock Demons to be comparable to Hunter Pets. Also familiarize yourself with what a Succubus actually is historically. They are not submissive, they are predators that kill men.

---

3. Fair. Lets replace them with loaves of bread. It worked great for Scholomance when other people were offended by the depictions of death. Point of fact, lets remove everything one individual finds offensive.

---

4. No arguments on the final point. A more robust character design interface would be great.

---

[Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord]

@Pyromor-shandris

They all are married

Then they wouldn’t be a concubine. Blizzard should change their name since that’s not what they are according to you.

[Pyromor-shandris (Pyromor)]

Head bang moment

[Elisiana-emerald-dream]

If we’re going by the definition you provided,

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

a woman with whom a man cohabits without being married

is not a

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

Sex slaves

To cohabit is consensual.

[anon30972072]

@Pyromor-shandris

Head bang moment

[Kaercha-area-52]

I was wondering when you’d resurface.

1. Anyone should be allowed to dress however they want for any reason they want. Removing options is just a step removed from putting everyone in Burkas. People can control their urges without a draconian dress code.

2. The succubus thing makes no sense. They’re a species of demon that’s well established, not just in WoW lore but Christian mythology as well. I do agree with adding an incubus, though. As well as a ton of other demon skins. Women and demons are different things.

3. Concubines are a real thing. Again, you can’t project into this. As far as we know, all those demons/blood elves wanted to be there. It’s a fantasy game. Fantasies are ok.

4. Agree with body types, and many more customizations besides.

[Pourrire-grobbulus]

Not saying it’s you, but that your topics (which is considered bait) were already talked about.

Either way, there’s more serious things to fix in game to curb horrible players and bad behavior like idk…ACTUAL MODERATORS IN GAME. WoW would be so much better if they had actual moderators and not a robot listening to in game player reports of spammers (lookin’ at you AOTC Mythic P2W sellers) and cleaning up the place.

[Sunzsu-alexstrasza]

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

revealing mogs need to be removed from the game. Objectifying characters does nothing positive in-game nor does it teach any sort of values to the younger players who play the game. If anything, it gives younger players a false perception of both real men and women and trains the player to objectify people in the real world.

No.

You don’t like revealing mogs? Don’t use them.

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

the succubus needs to go. The succubus, wearing revealing clothing, is summoned by her “master” to do the masters bidding. The succubus needs to be removed from the game or a male model needs to be added to the game. This portrays women in a submissive fashion and is vulgar.

The succubus is fine. It’s a demon the warlock made a deal with to gain her services, not a sex slave

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

• the concubines in the Black Temple need to go for obvious reasons. Sex slaves aren’t very cool.

This just in: villains do bad things. News at 11.

@Yesuna-wyrmrest-accord

more body types need to be added to all races.

Only thing you said that was reasonable.

[Liadariel-runetotem]

@Pourrire-grobbulus

Either way, there’s more serious things to fix in game to curb horrible players and bad behavior like idk…ACTUAL MODERATORS IN GAME. WoW would be so much better if they had actual moderators and not a robot listening to in game player reports of spammers (lookin’ at you AOTC Mythic P2W sellers) and cleaning up the place.

THIS ^^^^^

[Lokath-blackhand (Lokath)]

What does this have to do with me