Yet the audience score is much lower, blizzards BBB rating isnt even posted and they got an F along with valve. Those ratings are based uppon what the critic says, most of which who have not completed much of the game, it be like me watching a movie preview then saying it looked fantastic.
This isn’t the first time the critics cast their lot with blizzard, remember that diablo immortal fiasco when every blue checkmark on twitter came to their defense and ended up getting dragged by the non blue collective. Also why do old devs constantly disagree with the direction of the game, and i mean the devs that made this franchise have a leg to even stand on. Most of your critic reviews are also from when the game came out meaning they haven’t even done raids or much of anything. They leveled and said it was great.
That be like me buying a car, driving for 1 block and giving it a great review. Then to find out later customers had the issue of a faulty transmission after 1,000 miles.
We have seen this and done this all before…
its easy to imagine as there are countless games with much better visuals.
lots of players play with sound off and have background noise to drown out
people with WM would disagree heavily
i’d question what? What has been done here that wasnt in previous xpacs?
is it? were still early on, who would say at the end of the xpac they would replay it? most of the bfa players would refuse that xpac.
Yet the user ratings are lower most of which point out countless similar issues.
Pretty sure BFA also got great reviews from those sources. Most review mags barely scratch the surface of the games they review. Additionally many have been questioned if they get “kickbacks” from the larger companies they review.
Also all those reviews were for release and not some of the stupid things they’ve done with patching recently. None of these reviews represent the current state of the game.