This post in that reddit thread though (edited for naughty words)
Which one of you was this?
Oh hey, did someone say high elf? Re-posting my “Blizz f’d up with void elves over the organic option high elves”.
Alliance want High Elves (not blood elves) because they were a huge part of the Alliance in WC2 and esp. WC3 - of the 13 units Alliance could build with Frozen Throne, 4 were high elves (~30%), plus a hero unit. The entire Alliance campaign in Frozen Throne, the story of the Alliance, is the High/blood elves, which now is the story of the Horde, and the Alliance were the villains of their own story?
“That’s WC3, this is WoW” you say; there are high elves everywhere in the Alliance experience, Blizz loves to feature them prominently e.g.:
-
[they’re one of the biggest Alliance quest hubs in BC];
-
they’re one of the most iconic Alliance rep grinds across multiple expacs, the Silver Covenant;
-
[they have a lengthy quest chain in Hinterlands in one of their remaining villages] and dozens of quests with individual high elves in a huge number of zones;
-
they’re one of the biggest rep grinds in MoP, the focus for purging Dalaran and patch 5.2, a war/battle where they built a navy large enough to oppose the Zandalari, dudes we’re losing our minds about in BfA because they have a huge navy;
-
there they were [in 7.1.5];
-
they’re 2 prominent and important Alliance lore characters, Alleria and Vareesa, with god knows how many pointless ones sprinkled in the lore along the way like [Ravandwyr];
There are more consistent Alliance high elf quest givers across expansions and zones than Pandas, they’re even featured heavily in MoP, and we play Pandas in whatever faction we want with identical models. Yes, pandas weren’t in the first 4 expac, but we’re 3 expac out from their intro and I have to stop and think for any panda guest giver outside MoP that isn’t “I heard there’s food around here”. Off the top of my head high elf quest givers are in:
A bunch of pointless food and shirt vendors no one uses in Stormwind and Dalaran are high elves, [Dalaran is infested with quel’dorei] look at that listthere are literally twice as many high elves as blood elves. Check the Darkmoon Faire - looks like a lot of blood elves work there, yeah? Nope, like a dozen nameless high elves slumming it as carnies. This isn’t some exhaustive list of zones or high elves Alliance interact with because it would take me hours to track them down! These are just the ones I remember “yeah, high elves there”.
And Blizz still puts in high elves in BfA in pointless ways which don’t further the story or promote a sense of rarity or specialness like e.g. San’layn. If you play Horde, [there’s as many high elves to fight in island expeditions as human ones; a whole fighting force is named for a bigwig Alliance high elf]. If you’re Alliance, the wizard that opens the portal to the Stromgarde Warfront, the one with all your quests in Arathi, the only NPC interaction Alliance have in one of the big new features of BfA? [Blue-eyed high elf] Why? Why put in a high elf in the void elf expansion , in a role that says nothing about high elves and could’ve been a million other human/gnome/whatever NPCs?
If you only play Horde and don’t get this (I main Alliance but had to go Horde for heroic raiding), imagine if the horde in vanilla was orcs, Tauren, undead, and goblins, and the alliance was humans, dwarves, night elves, and high elves (interestingly, no gnomes in WC3). What gives, where’s the horde’s trolls? They’ve been around since WC2, no darkspear? to which Blizz’s response was “they were 1 tribe, most died on that island, but hey, maybe later”. Then in BC, new races! The Alliance gets forest trolls, meanwhile the Horde gets something that’s a total lore rework (WC3 draenei vs. WoW draenei) and feels pulled out of their bum, but ok, at least Alliance didn’t get the darkspear, and Blizzard confirms “maybe darkspear… someday”. Then in Wrath, after tons of trolls scattered here and there in questing and lore, we finally see a darkspear army, a whole city of them… but they’re an unplayable faction… yet leading the Horde in Icecrown…? Now it’s cata, the Alliance finally gets their gnomes, meanwhile the Horde gets another out-of-nowhere race. Seriously? The Horde are then teased stupid with darkspear for the next 3 expansions as quest givers, another rep grind, and major movers in lore, but most accept its never coming. Then, BfA - it’s rainin’ dark irons, Horde’s getting brown orcs, it’s happening, if ever there was a time for darkspear this is it! Nope, it’s lightforged trolls, pious servants of a Light Loa with Naaru crystals for hair, Alliance defectors/traitors who secretly always wanted to be in the Horde… da heck? Sure, that’s mostly a troll model, but that is not at all the cannibal voodoo dude you’ve seen everywhere for years and asked to play as since day 1! Then, when asked about it, the response was a condescending non-apology, literally “[if you want that vicious mojo master, sorry? The Alliance is waiting for you?]
IMO this speaks volumes about how Blizz handles reasonable feedback and has tortured existing lore and general coherence of the world to satisfy new design/marketing objectives. To be clear, it’s not world ending that high elves aren’t playable, but it says something about how Blizz views feedback that it either repeats handwringing arguments for “why they can’t" despite legions of community feedback over years about how that’s not remotely consistent with game or lore experiences or now other allied races, or more importantly, Blizz mocks them/speaks condescendingly to their customers, as Ion did in that Q&A, rather than explain to them like adults why they don’t want to and think the game is better this way, which could be totally reasonable ([although that condescension isn’t new to BfA], and maybe like classic servers someday this will change).
If a blizz employee reads this, please don’t misinterpret it as “make it consistent (stop using them)” - people want high elves for the same reason I/Horde wanted mag’har. We had orcs, why do we need brown ones? Maghar embodied a lost heritage, what the orcs were/should have been without demonic corruption. Similarly, high elves embody the Alliance’s resolve through loss, its certainty that what’s right will prevail, that sacrificing the moral high ground even to survive like the Sin’dorei did costs you something more important. It made so much sense to see the Silver Covenant in Wrath and again in 5.2 and Suramar. That’s why people get excited when High elves are part of the story in meaningful ways and are angry about void elves - it’s not about the cosmetics (for some it is, sure) but because their lore fundamentally aligns with blood elf pragmatism rather than Alliance idealism. The shame is that new content will probably use void elves any time it might’ve made sense to have high elves, and if so that’s a massive waste, because that would silently obliterate a unique part of WoW’s lore, one of the only conflicts that truly is ambiguous in the perspectives of the two factions.
Last 2 cents/crazy town: high elves probably were an allied race and Blizz chickened out. Arathi warfront was undoubtedly vertical slice work, they probably shelved it when practicallly done and full BfA production greenlit around 7.2 or 7.1, then, for whatever reason, changed their minds and went with void elves before 7.3 and either forgot or no one cared to change that portal NPC or island expedition character when there were so many other bigger bugs. It’s speculation, but I worked in AAA game dev. for years, those changes happen and that kind of error is everywhere in shipped games, those 2 are conspicuous when they gave us void elves and knew high elves were contentious.