I never mention Steam, ratings, nor Steam ratings.
You didn’t have to.
Well, I see this conversation is going nowhere. I cannot imagine how you define things as everything looks to just blend together for you and prevents discussions from being had.
It’s called context. Things can mean different things based on context. You are wildly out of context
1 Like
You intentionally remove context. You believe 1 in 101 is considered mixed. The cognitive dissonance is insane…
Yall: Gimme this
Blizz: K we’ll think about it
Yall: UGH LOOK AT THIS IDIOT OBVIOUSLY ITS PR
Like. Bruh just say thank you
1 Like
I made no remark to the amount. you don’t know. I don’t know. Only that there is many people on both sides. Context isn’t removed. you are changing the context
1 Like
Hey it’ll give people what they have been asking for.
A hide pants 
option 
1 Like
You are correct: I made a mistake.
I did misread, and admitted such. However to still claim that the feedback is mixed when you have no reference on the population nor any indication to the size of the feedback for any and all responses is still idiotic, hence my example I demonstrated with a question.
Reposting here my issue with the Visages so more people can start hammering the Developers on that issue also. They need to make the male Human model available for players as well as the female Elf model. Why do they need to do that? Basic fairness and fundamental equality. Something Blizzard USED to do with the Horde and Alliance religiously.
Simple truth is, if you give Player A something, you give the same to Player B also.
You don’t give them something different and say “Be glad for it.” This would be like giving Males the Male Blood Elf as a Visage Dragonified and then giving Females the Female Dwarf as a Visage Dragonified and then saying. “There you go. Enjoy Girls.”
If you can’t see the problem your intentionally ignoring it or engaging in whataboutisms.
It is the same here. Only this time, it’s a little more subtle since now we have a scenario where instead of sexualizing women, the individual in question is sexualizing men. The issue here is that while he does that, he is in the same breath telling all women they are NOT allowed to have the same.
…Which is quite ironically the same thing Blizzard always has had a issue with. Treating women unequally and considering them an afterthought. Whether it be subpar pay, subpar models, or just a subpar experience if you rolled a female Drakthyr it’s all the same. Many people feel their experience was marginalized because they got something subpar.
If the cause of it is who I suspect, namely the employees that melted down during the bowls of fruit incident; then apparently those developers appear to feel that this conduct is alright, only because they are not objectifying women, but rather men.
Pretty sentiments, but the problem here is that “this isn’t about sex” or attraction. My issue isabout equality, pure and simple. The sexuality doesn’t matter and isn’t the issue here. The fact at issue is that you gave a very popular model to one gender, and instead of giving its coeval, you intentionally gave a less popular and less played one to the other. Inequality is NEVER alright.
Pretty simple scenario. You are either for equality or you are a supremacist.
There is no middle ground with something that fundamental.
/The End
A dev liked a tweet.
Defending the aesthetic of the skinny models while also working on thicker ones as part of expanded customization are not mutually exclusive positions.
1 Like
That is true. Hopefully everyone is happy now.
he wasnt liking any tweets about a thicker Dracthyr model… sure felt like he wanted people to defend his thin vision and not argue against it.
My god. somebody liked a tweet. Thank you for bringing this dire news to the forums.
Will there be a smaller slender dragon model for females?
Nah, that’s not stalker or creeper-like at all to look up the designer, find them on Twitter, and then check every single one of their likes. 
Also this 
It doesn’t matter how they came to the decision. Remember: it’s actually a good thing for them to listen to the community, whether they admit it or not. It only matters that they did.
This post only comes across as a petty attempt to shine extra bad light on Blizzard where it isn’t due, for once.
No, Im sorry you are making this up…
[1] Undead
[2] Nightborne
[3] Void Elf
Are all thin, caster capable races and you can add
[4] Gnomes
[5] Mechagnomes
[6] Goblin
As non-buff, races as well.
There hasnt been a shortage of thin races for some long time. Drac’thyr will not be unique or filling any niche because they are thin.
1 Like