The real reason why Tyrande is angry

Tyrande: Anduin I need your help

Anduin: Nope lmao spread too thin :joy:

Saurfang: Anduin I need your help

Anduin: Sure! I’ll give you the very last remnants of my army to help with your personal vendetta.

42 Likes

And now, Anduin has doubled the size of the force fighting for what he wants. Seems like he made a sound choice as far as tactic goes. He keeps his allies helping Tyrande, but he gains nothing.

11 Likes

… theres a little more to it than that…

I mean… if this is how you really saw it, explains why the writers keep reaching for the crayon box.

16 Likes

“Anduin I need help, please send an army so we can take back this beach. Please hurry summer is almost over and all our new swim wear will be for nothing!”

5 Likes

“Personal Vendetta”

Riiiight. Because thousands of innocent civilians being burnt alive in their city is a “personal vendetta.”

And people wonder why Alliance players question Horde logic when they try to bring up counter points to arguments when it comes to story on the forum?

Meanwhile, the writers outright told us we need to “accept” the fact that Tyrande “got her revenge” by killing a single Val’kyr. Because apparently one Val’kyr (that doesn’t actually affect Sylvanas, because she still has 3 - meaning she can still revive) is worth thousands of lives and a world tree.

14 Likes

Anduins a failure of a king.

Cares more about uniting The Horde than his own people. And i’m so glad NPCs are starting to talk about it. I hope it bites him in the rear.

7 Likes

Had to have bad story in the filler expansion so tyrande will be a cool raid boss in the next one.

Hi Tyierin!
making another thread i see?

8 Likes

I think Anduin is just so fixated on establishing peace that it comes at the cost of his allies.

The reason why he helped Saurfang was because if their efforts were successful, they would have at least some basic diplomatic flexibility.

If he had helped Tyrande, it would just propagate more war.

Not saying he was wrong or right, just saying he’s really staying in character and sticking to the whole peace shtick.

2 Likes

Ending the war with the Horde saves more lives than following Tyrande’s quest for vengeance.

5 Likes

Actually the best most sensible one yet though to be honest.

only disappointment of it, is the lack of chili fries.

1 Like

If you read Tyierin’s post, the personal vendetta mentioned was SAURFANG’S personal vendetta.

1 Like

That part was directed at Saurfang, I’m pretty sure.

Well!? Where they be?? :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: better get them out before a certain gnome brings in a tray of cookies.

It saves more Horde lives, anyway. It also teaches the Horde they can get away with invasion and genocide, which in the long run is going to cost way more Alliance lives than any short term savings.

3 Likes

hands tray of chili fries

:hot_pepper::fries:
here ya go.

1 Like

Thank you kind sir! :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:

1 Like

I wouldn’t be too worried. Tyrande is going to go brutal and feral in her vengeance, just as a Night Elf should!

4 Likes

It saves Alliance lives as well.

We already learned that lesson back in MoP. Blizzard won’t allow the Horde to face any repercussions for what they’ve done. Aiding Tyrande wouldn’t have changed that.