The new Guild UI and Permissions...yikes (Part 1)

Hiya Fumel,

Yes, the new guild finder is a definite improvement, and being able to invite offline players is a welcome addition. It would be nice to have a way to clear certain lines from the log (such being able to remove the people who joined, joined another or cancel and just keep the approved/pending).

The permissions remain problematic for guilds like our social guild where we have always had multiple levels of officers, and as we have discussed previously, create issues for a variety of other types of guilds.

Since you mentioned it, I will also say that I find the brutosaur decision to be confounding. Nothing was ever said to suggest that it was anything different than the yak or mammoth. Personally, Iā€™ve spent over 500k just in the last couple of weeks on pets and mounts for myself and my son and probably 1.5-2m during BFA on goodies for my family and friends. Had it been disclosed that the mount would be going away at some point, I would have budgeted differently.

Glad youā€™re back with us! :slightly_smiling_face:

5 Likes

Just wanted to add that it would be nice to be able to see the date when they were approved and be able to rescind the approval. (Has anyone seen any docs on this? Do we know how long the approval lasts or how long things stay in the log?)

And not to be snide, but why is communication such a challenge, even when good things are happening? :woman_shrugging:

6 Likes

This is a salient point. I had three approved applications waiting for a response the last time I looked. Iā€™m willing to wait on them a while, but I donā€™t think I want to have them hanging around forever. If the players canā€™t make up their minds in a reasonable time, guilds ought to be able to rescind the invitations.

4 Likes

Exactly. For our social guild itā€™s an inconvenience, but letā€™s say you have a raiding guild and invite a player for a particular role and they donā€™t accept in a timely fashion, so you fill it with someone else. You should be able to rescind the invitation and not just have them join whenever they feel like it (waiting for them join so you can remove them shouldnā€™t be the default behavior). I can think of several scenarios like this.

But in the event someone actually reads this (yeah, snarky I know, but it has been over a year now!) - I would rather have the permissions unbundled. Thanks Uncle Blizzā€¦

5 Likes

Because code that doesnā€™t exist is code you donā€™t have to pay people to maintain. That means they can milk an extra tenth of a percentage point of profit for their investors and get those fat bonuses. They care exactly as much about user experience as we make them care, and they only way to make them care is to impact their metrics and unsubscribe.

Itā€™s harsh, but that is the reality of who you are dealing with here.

2 Likes

Still wishing I had more options for assigning permissions now that I have more members in my guild. Itā€™s just a little guild designed for alts, but I want to treat everyone fairly.

I canā€™t imagine how difficult it must be to handle a large guild that has a lot of different things going on. I mean, if your guild only does raiding, I suppose you could get by with the permissions lumped together. But I think it would be a nightmare if a guild had all kinds of other events for the members and the GM couldnā€™t assign permissions as needed. All the ā€œhelperā€ characters would have to be officersā€“even if they didnā€™t need all those permissions.

We were told to give specific feedback and offer suggestions for solving our problem(s). Having the permissions separated out again is the very best solution for our problem. It doesnā€™t get any more specific than that.

7 Likes

Still no news about this request?
With having only the toggle itā€™s basically like having only 3 effective ranks in the guild.

1 Like

No changes on the permissionsā€“but I expect Blizz to announce some sort of ā€œamazingā€ overhaul of guilds before we actually see any improvements. They take stuff away in stealth mode, but they send off fireworks when they add things.

One of my new members donated money to the bank, so I felt I had to give a promotion. Itā€™s getting hard to find appropriate ways to thank members for their generosity. Especially since at least three of my newest members are way richer than I am! It would be nice to have more perks to unlock, or a guild hall with special vendors, or something new and shiny to make guilds feel special again.

6 Likes

Well, for some reason I canā€™t seem to change my forum avatar. :face_with_raised_eyebrow:

Pretend this is being posted by a certain red-haired human rogue instead of a black-horned tauren hunter:

Got another request to join my guild today. A few of the previous applicants chose other guilds, which is fine. Iā€™m beginning to completely agree with Polgaraā€™s desire to clean up the applicant history. The only reason I can see for keeping track of who declined an invitation would be so I could not invite them if they applied again. But I would never reject an applicant out of spite that they joined a different guild when I first invited them, so keeping track of that is just silly.

Still, I thing the new guild finder is much better than the old one despite its few flaws. I wish I could say the same thing about the changes to the permissions. We really need to have the old permissions back. This is just getting ridiculous.

4 Likes

Still waiting for these horrible permissions changes to be reverted. Still being ignored by Blizzard as expected.

2 Likes

Is anyone else having any issues changing their forum avatar? I made a post in the website bug thread, but thatā€™s not actually fixing the problem for me. I suppose I can try the CS forum if things donā€™t get straightened out soon.

All I really want is for the game (and the forums) to function properly. That includes having the permissions fixed. Ion acknowledged there was an issue with the permissions and that they were actively working on a fix. That means the permissions arenā€™t ā€œworking as intendedā€ and we arenā€™t wrong to be expecting some action on them.

Yes, the new guild finder is definitely a step in the right direction, but itā€™s not a fix. I truly hope we donā€™t have to wait another year for this.

2 Likes

Yay! A poster in the CS forum gave me a solution to my avatar problem. :grin:

Now, if only Blizzard would come up with a solution to our permissions problem, things would be going great! My little guild is doing okay, but Iā€™d sure like to maybe be more than an alt guild. I just donā€™t know how I can manage a ā€œrealā€ guild if I canā€™t delegate responsibilities. I sincerely donā€™t have the time to run one all by myself. I barely have time to play.

I still think that more perks designed for all sizes of guilds would be great. Guild Halls have been discussed in this thread multiple times. Rewards that could be earned by small guilds would be terrific. We have all these ideas that have been repeatedly brought up in this thread, but the number one thing we want is still granular permissions. I truly donā€™t see whatā€™s so hard about that.

2 Likes

The discussion in the Brutosaur thread has touched on containment threads. How Blizzard shunts everything into a mega thread when a controversy crops up, then ignores it until it goes away.

Iā€™d like to think thatā€™s not really what theyā€™re doing here. That Ion wasnā€™t lying when he said they were working to fix the permissions, and that he really does want other suggestions for improving guilds.

Contrary to what another contributor here says, I donā€™t post here to ā€œpad my statsā€ (whatever that actually means). I post because I feel the all-in-one permissions are terrible for guild management. We absolutely need the granular permissions back so we can properly manage our guilds.

Iā€™m not going to let this issue drop, even if Iā€™m the last one posting. Contain me if you want, but youā€™re not going to shut me up.

4 Likes

This. Itā€™s a terrible, terrible way to have it set up.

4 Likes

Were his lips moving?

2 Likes

Lol. I honestly donā€™t remember. Ion is a lawyer, so yeah, itā€™s hard to be optimistic about his ā€œtruthiness.ā€

No big changes on the guild front, unfortunately. Still have several approved applicants who havenā€™t made any decisions. I guess is doesnā€™t matter in my guildā€™s case, but Iā€™m sure some guilds would find it frustrating to not know if an applicant was going to accept or not. There doesnā€™t seem to be a way to rescind an invitation.

Of course, tweaks to the guild finder arenā€™t nearly as important as bringing back granular permissions. Iā€™ve thought hard about some kind of ā€œcompromiseā€, but there really isnā€™t one. We need to have the permissions separated so they can be assigned as needed. Every guild had different needs. A one-size-fits-all guild control simply doesnā€™t work.

2 Likes

Iā€™m back.

The Jets are taboo and must not be spoken of (and of course, they LOST TO THE BENGALS).

lol.

Fix the permissions.

3 Likes

Iā€™ve considered going back and quoting more of the great suggestions posted throughout this thread, but if Blizzard didnā€™t read them the first time, why would they read them now?

Aside from breaking up the permissions and adding more controls, there have been numerous detailed suggestions regarding guild halls and perks. Blizzard never said anything about the new guild finder until it showed up on the PTR. Dare we hope that other guild improvements will suddenly appear for testing? Fingers are crossed! :crossed_fingers:

3 Likes

After much deliberation, Grahams has decided to give it one more go.

Which means we need those permissions reverted.

Letā€™s go blizz.

(If the Jets go on another win-streak though, you fail).

4 Likes

So, no big changes in my guild since the initial wave of applicants. My new members have been very nice. People have filled up the bank and donated gold. I used some of that gold to buy another tab.

Iā€™ve promoted them as best I can, but I canā€™t make them officers because that would give them way too many permissions. One left the guild and moved on to another. They didnā€™t say why, but Iā€™m sure they just decided they wanted a more active guild. Mine is currently an alt guild where people can get guild perks without having to deal with any guild drama or responsibilities. I fear itā€™s going to stay this way unless I can get more granular guild controls.

2 Likes