Yet you cant see where she openly lies about:
Me not providing sources
Me being pressured for sources
Me not saying that RPG played into the encyclopedia.
Youre bad at this.
With this crowd?
2 Likes
I walked into that one.
1 Like
No I am not, but you ought to know it when you see it because⊠yikes
1 Like
Yes you are, you are trying to gaslight him by claiming he is being disingenuous when he isnât being disingenuous! Iâve never seen him be disingenuous. He only gives good lore arguments that are incredibly well informed!
5 Likes
Yet your amazing gift at typing while blind doesnt give you the ability to tell when someone is openly lying and got exposed for lyingâŠthree times in a row.
1 Like
YOu didnât.
You were. Indeed, you still havenât showed us any actual canon source for your Stormwind claim, which was originally asked for.
You said, but thatâs not a fact.
2 Likes
I just showed I did.
Pressed =/= being asked one time then supplying sources. You have a very weird definition of being pressed.
Prove me wrong.
Twisting words to fit a narrative is all I see being done, and I did comment on it, I called it disingenuous, but it was to the point of calling them a liar which they are not.
Whats being twisted by me?
They are.
That is literally what you are doing sir. Quit gaslighting people.
3 Likes
haha. stop that.
oh gads. now youâve done it.
hahaha.
So, whereâs the canon source, Bourbon? YOu are dodging the question, while you could just show us the canon source of your claim.
THatâs not how burden of proof works. Itâs you that needs to prove your statement is true.
I have the RPG books, and I know the Encyclopedia actually retcons a lot of them.
1 Like
Man Im twisting words by showing where I provided sources after being asked ONE TIME for themâŠafter someone accuses me of not presenting them and being pressed for them.
God I love how apologist the pro-side is . Keep supporting, never use your brain.
The Encyclopedia.
You just said thats not where it was, then the burden of proof is on youâŠsince you are making a claim that the source isnt accurate. So yes, prove the source wrong.
Its sad, because that is what happened at one point.
Gaslighting is doubled down on when called out, so the fact that it bothered you to such an extent you feel the need to make a mockery and pin it on me is just more classic behavior of which I pointed out. I would say drop it
Thats what you are doing though. Just keep supporting, dont use your brain. PRO SIDE DO NO WRONG
So stop doubling down on it? I donât know what to tell you.
I am not making a mockery, I am making an observation of your behavior. I say you should stop it, and stop doing the thing you accuse others of doing.
Where? Quote it! Why donât you at least put a link and a quote?
Whereâs it, Bourbon?
When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo .[1] This is also stated in Hitchensâs razor. Carl Sagan proposed a related criterion, the Sagan standard, âextraordinary claims require extraordinary evidenceâ.[2]