My standards are set so high, the bias that bars you from seeing my high standards isnât my problem. I view all arguments argued with kindness to be valuable. I view personal growth in being able to make a decision and then do a 180 and change course because seeing the other sides argument displays wisdom, and maturity.
I continue to support HEs and the lore arguments in support of them
No, youâre not obligated to reassert your position to me just because Iâve asked â but you might want to consider asserting it at least once, to anybody, before you start suggesting youâre understanding of the circumstances is superior to everybody else (especially while, conveniently, refusing to actually corroborate anything youâre stating).
Are you being sarcastic hun?.
You do pretty much all the opposite of that.
You just cheer randomly to everything that the helfers say, it doesnât matter how lame it is.
Yes, and we all know how where Yrelâs story ultimately ended up going. Also, Khadgar was only ever on the Alliance side in Warcraft 2. Ever since he first showed up in WoW, heâs always been neutral. And now, heâs pretty much vanished off the face of the planet.
Do I really need to get started on how incredibly short and easily completed that storyline was, compared to the Suramar one; which had much more character development and actually required you to build up reputation to complete it, again?
Is this where we pretend any alliance story doesnât count and neutral zone stories are horde because of stuff that happened next expansion basically?
I mean, my arguments have been misrepresented multiple times beforeâŠso no difference really. Its not like I call you guys out when you act silly and get off topic in arguments.
Your sealioning is actually funny though, still minor league.