Well the Quelâdorei was the term that was originally used to describe the Highborne in a kind of we are the superior race of elves kind of way. Over 10,000 years though itâs changed to reference High Elves , to contrast the Night Elves who are the Kaldorei
Even the game referenced the High Elf as Quelâdorei and the difference of the all the elves, Hope this help explain why I used Quelâdorei.
âBehold this motley throng in which the rebels put their faith.
Kaldorei? You disgrace [a glorious past], hiding in trees and cloaking yourselves in false piety. You have grown as savage as the [trolls] that skulk about your forests.
Quelâdorei? You are peasants playing at nobility, all too willing to mingle with lesser races that dilute your bloodline. You are unworthy of the name high elves.
Sinâdorei? Of all the elves, I thought you might understand the choice I made to save my people. Instead, you ally with misfits and monsters.
Each of you has debased your proud lineage. Each of you has forgotten the ancient power that is our birthright.
Let this failed rebellion be a lesson to any that would stand against the shalâdorei
â Elisandeâs retort (actually says it in game)
You are just backing up a straw argument with another straw argument.
Just to show how wrong you are, this is my original first message on this HM/VE discussionb:
There, you have it. I cited Legion from the start, and showed how HM got more because their recruitment storyline was way better, while not dragging far behind the void elves in 8.0-8.2.5 content.
Itâs all there, in the first message. No goal moved during the entire discussion.
You, on the other hand, gave me these âargumentsâ:
Thatâs the kind of dishonesty you have. Instead of answering arguments, you throw personal attacks.
And then when I insist in the original arguments, you say Iâm âchanging goalpostsâ.
Iâm just sharing my thoughts on it now. If weâre comparing the content theyâve gotten in BfA I think itâs safe to say the HM didnât get close to any because they donât need it
As said, moving the goalpost itâs moving the goalpost.
You keep applying different standards to two things and pretending some things count for others but not for Void elves because itâs convenient for you.
No theyâre not. None of those serve as development for the dwarves. Also Magni is no longer king, the Council of the Three Hammers exist.
And then you resort to projecting and victimizationâŠ
Well, HM didnât really have a spotlight. They didnât have a candlelight.
I mean, the same could be said about magâhar and lfd, but it is what it is.
All Allied races are severely lacking on development, and thatâs the main reason why Iâm against more races being added in general, because it only adds to the pile of underdeveloped races.
For Void elves, they had a bad start, but comparing bad with bad doesnât make one of those that have it bad (Void elves) worseâŠ