Funny you should say that, it was the point I was making.
We could definitely say the same thing about those who argue for playable Alliance high elves.
Funny you should say that, it was the point I was making.
We could definitely say the same thing about those who argue for playable Alliance high elves.
Which is also the point I was making. Thereās a reason I said āsomeā and not all.
Guzzleā¦ come on.
He has a point.
He doesnāt.
Other people who are asking for an allied race deal with differing opinions much better.
No, he doesnāt. He has made some fair points before but this isnāt one of them.
Saying some people argue in bad faith, troll, have good points, laugh a lot, etc isnāt saying everyone whoever argues from a particular side of a discussion is in that one category.
Otherwise we wouldnāt be able to have a discussion at all. The fact people can disagree or agree, even if theyāre not all on the same pages, suggests that we can. Weāre chatting right now, after all. Even if we disagree.
Sorry, my mistake.
You said that most posts against high elves are being pricks.
Weād all be better off if folk would be less aggressive about all this. Lol
Forgive me, I didnāt realize you were beyond reproach.
I get it, we just have to use qualifiers from now on.
You mean like constantly trying to dismiss other peopleās concerns as them being spiteful?
That would be a nice change.
Yeah. I mean on both sides. Iāve seen this place fall to literal name calling like 12 timesā¦ In a few days.
I understand some of the concerns, but what are we supposed to do, give up on a race we enjoy? What sort of response to concerns are people looking for exactly?
After doing the whole reduction/dismisal thing, she didnāt much like having it done to her.
Of course not. And i certaintly donāt have a good answer. Canāt control folk. Just gotta respond calmly as one can to their points I guess.
I am talking about this. How do others deal with opposing opinions to your satisfaction? What is satisfactory to you?
Because from what Iāve seen in at least two threads, that seems to be the case. Not that most antiās themselves are like that, only that most responses from the most common posters. Sometimes people just get an attitude and I canāt fault anyone for that, really. As long as theyāre not consistently bothering people, obviously.
Being fair, itās a subject thatās come up since ā¦what, forever?
My observations of the conversation since the Mega-thread are of course anecdotal, as anyoneās experience tends to be. Iām just speaking from my own experience here.
Thereās bad faith actors on both sides, though ā¦I shouldnāt need to have to point that out, I would think.
No oneās saying that you should stop asking. And yeah, the end-goal of the strictest interpretation for the anti position would be the abandonment of the pro position. However that doesnāt mean there has to be these constant moral judgements and personal attacks.