So you made up something about how I’m in favor of classic era in order to make it work. Figures you’d have to invent something for me to believe to level that hypocrite charge. Well done and the mark of a well adjusted non-pathetic non-hypocrite.
I will revel.
Good luck getting what you want for free from a profit-driven business by complaining loudly that the service you used for years entitles you to it.
If blizzard reads these posts, who do you think they connect with more? Gimmie gimmie gimmie trust-me-bro non-unique subs posts? Or the people who understand they are a business.
again bro just stay in retail fourms, WE NEED TBC AND WOTLK ERA sorry this offends u so bad for some reason
3 Likes
Bwahaha. Apparently I’m the offended one but several posts up you started with the “this doesn’t concern you so go away”. You were literally offended to the point of illiteracy. Projection at its finest and totally 100% sanity exemplified.
I’ll continue to post where i like. Thanks.
If it were popular, you’d have it. Its not, so you don’t.
im not offended im annoyed. u retail players literally have no clue. clearly the mention of tbc era deeply offends u tho
2 Likes
And just as clearly finding out that your preferred mode isn’t popular enough to get what you want sends you into a tantrum. 100% sane.
It was nice to see other specs ontop than the usual suspects. However, I do like me a DK.
theres 10k raiders on classic era which is a 5 year old server according to warcraft logs a tbc era would bring similar numbers if not more. where is ur proof that it would fail?
1 Like
You dont have it yet, all the proof needed. I also don’t believe 10k individual active raiders.
10k on na alone bro but yeah that does include alts. we dont have it because vanilla era was dead when tbc went into wrath, mainly because of the way cloning our toons was done.
Lol 10k non unique including alts. I figured it was something like this. I think the fact you offered that number up as proof says everything that needs to be said. Don’t forget not a single one of those 10k represent tbc era profits should it launch.
If it were steadily popular enough at any point, you’d have it.
10k na alone unique characters yes which is good. and we are asking for our anniversary characters to be able to stay in tbc and wrath. we dont play anything after wrath retail is completely dead to me
You completely stripped your own 10k number of any value when you admitted it included alts. Another point you stolidly ignore is that tbc era needs to bring unique subs to validate its existence, so 10k classic era raid logs had no value to begin with as far as tbc era profitability.
tbc will bring unique subs theres thousands of tbc andys. 10k NA alone btw and that number does matter because its on a era realm, which is what we are asking for
theres another 10k unique character logs on EU. also pretty sure classic era is the most popular wow version in china with like millions of players
Show some proof there are thousands waiting to stay engaged with tbc era content indefinitely. I’m not talking about first few phases. I mean proof positive you have the numbers playing permanent last patch. As far as I’m concerned, blizz has already provided proof to the contrary by not releasing tbc era. I am sure however that they’d be interested in said proof of these numbers.
You keep willfully ignoring this next part. When releasing a new product it is irrelevant to a company how many people are using its other products, each product must be profitable. So no, even if there actually were 10k classic era na subs, it means nothing to blizzard when considering launching tbc era. TBC era needs to pay for itself. Crossover players like you are NOT in consideration since you do not represent new subs.
If you represented a community of new blizz subs for tbc era, you’d have it already. You don’t.
well the numbers from classic era are there that has been in the last patch for over 3 years. so classic era is proof playing in the last patch forever does work. as for tbcs popularity just look at various private servers over the past decade they have all been vanilla and tbc and wotlk focused. also look at the chart of wow subscriber counts. a good business model also includes keeping exsisting customers happy and subscribed. me and others have said we might unsubscribe if the servers force us into cata yet again. if they force me into an expansion i dont want yet again i def will never play another fresh
1 Like
era servers for the best 3 versions of the game with fresh servers cycling thru where they give us the option to stay in the expansion we choose is the best possible thing to happen to classic.
3 Likes
Best possible thing for you. Not for the business.
A good business model includes keeping your existing customer base happy and subscribed, while maintaining profitability across all products produced by the business. There fixed it for you.
Also a “me and my bros will all quit” threat doesn’t mean much. To me or blizz. If you had enough bros to make it a legit threat, you’d probably have tbc era already.
Again, classic era engagement is irrelevant. Even non-unique sub engagement with tbc era (if it launched) is irrelevant. Only new unique tbc era subs are relevant. Private server engagement stats have already been obtained by blizzard and didn’t swing them in your favor. Not entirely sure why you think you have this info but blizzard doesn’t. Your fav expacs are irrelevant. Saying “go look it up” kinda means you didn’t find the answers yourself. None of that last post was proof.
Wanting something for free and threatening to quit if you don’t get it isn’t going to move the needle for blizz at all.
we didnt get tbc era the first go around because classic era only had a few hundred players at the time when tbc progressed to wrath. but people will miss tbc and wrath yet again like we are right now. and it is a well known fact tbc and wrath had the highest subscriber count in wow’s history