Im sure hes a good kid but I dont censor myself for anyone. No offense. Dont like it just ignore it. /shrug.
I wouldnt dare say informative. I halfassed made them for luls. I never even played in Vanilla and was telling people how to play Vanilla for instance. Videos were jokes man. The MM one was just to show how stupid the spec was.
Never was an excuse, I been telling you this since the start. You chose to ignore it. Thats on you for fooling yourself as I never pretended to be legit so.
Never said it was legit homie. Learn to pay attention bra.
My mistake for not making it look more like this random dudes video. That was my mistake the entire time as I made the videos way before we ever met :^) I should of known some crybaby in the UK would get offended when I uploaded them in 2019.
Literally that meme of the npc crying wearing the mask with a smile
Yeah no. I have always posted on the forums. I just decided to see whos crying in the hunter discord as its hilarious no matter what blizzard does theres a bepples for every category seething over something non important. And no.
I think the only videos I made where I was being legit was the ones where I said who cares if someone buys store mounts. This is what annoys me about you is no matter how much I say it was never meant to be taken seriously, you want it to be real to mend that ego of yours. Bro they were never serious. Keep thinking otherwise because I know how much you hate being wrong on here.
Because you are the only person here who even cares. I dont expect people to quickly log on and see what Bepples thinks of a joke channel. Id image people have better things to do with their lives. I only give you the time of day because its hilarious to me an adult would come here and cry more than a teenage girl not fitting a prom dress. Its just pathetic and you openly do it anyways for some strange reason. You need to open ya blinds and remember this is a video game, the internet exist to make fun of people, and your opinion will never matter in the grand scheme of things.
As you saw in his reply, he does not care. He wrote “no offense”, but considering he’s the definition of someone who gets offended when he can’t offend others, I would say just try your best to ignore him. Many of his posts include language/words that are against the Code of Conduct, so simply flag those and ignore the rest. Or if you want, just put him on ignore altogether.
1 Like
Yes I have ignored him for most of his post; however, I am just tired of those who do not understand what it is like to see my son act a little differently, and poeple just stare cause they can not understand that he thinks a little differently.
He has quirks that make him unique and no one should put him in a lower capacity than me or you. If someone is that unsympathetic then they just just have never been treated as lower.
Maybe try Dr. Phil. This is a video game forum.
1 Like
So, when did it then become logical to refer to someone else’s mental, or physical capacity, on a video game forum? Solely for the sake of diminishing what they said, to ridicule another person…
When the internet was created… If you get offended that easily, you probably need to walk away from the internet. Note, I’m not defending what was originally said, but to go and bring your child into it is also pretty dumb.
1 Like
Code of Conduct
Read the opening paragraph…
While I ofc understand that arguments can get heated, using references to mental health, or physical, as a means of ridicule, is so far from what’s intended with these forum. And as a reminder, said poster deliberately posts things like these, just to offend other people.
First, see above…
Second, I didn’t and am not defending what was said. If I happened to say it (I wouldn’t but for the sake of argument let’s say I did) and someone asked me not to use that reference. I simply wouldn’t use it. I’m not defending what he said, period.
Now that said, censorship in this regard is a slippery slope. Aside from the normal idiocy that goes on in the hunter forums, who gets to decide what is a dumb, meaningless insult versus something that is truly offensive? The safe space, group think crowd deems anything not in agreement with their viewpoint as offensive. Where is the line drawn?
Further, imagine having to know what will or will not trigger people. The internet isn’t a safe space, and it shouldn’t be. While I agree the name calling does get out of hand from both sides at times, there are very, very few times when someone has done or said anything personal. I could easily argue bringing in someone’s youtube and berating non-WoW content is questionable at best as well… but your side doesn’t seem to mind when that happens. Why not?
1 Like
Those would all work for a melee hunter but I reject the idea that modern SV is a melee hunter. And I would probably prefer BM as a melee spec, with exotic beasts and very chonky hits and AoE (as long as they dont take away any more exotic pet abilities).
Because we’ve already told you several times that you don’t understand how spec design works
Survival currently works for melee because it is designed and balanced for melee
1 Like
Dont twist words
It would not work as a talent in a ranged spec
It does work as a spec on its own, since the spec is designed to be done by melee
I already responded to that. Survival is so ill-equipped for melee combat that it’s largely undesirable in PvE content. Most melee have extensive mitigation and self-healing options. Hunters are famously squishy with very few options.
The only “bonuses” SV gets for being melee over the rest of the class are:
- Harpoon, a gap closer, which could exist within a hypothetical BM melee talent option anyway
- Spirit Bond, a heal that doesn’t amount to much and used to belong to BM anyway
So with a couple of inclusions suddenly a hypothetical talented melee BM would be just as “designed for melee” as current SV is.
You’re not actually making any real argument here. You’re just appealing to “design magic”. This is common in video game fanboyism. “The devs designed for it” is a thought-terminating cliche. This is part of a broader trend of you not ever bothering to actually elaborate any argument. You almost exclusively post 1-2 line posts without any real substance. Are you even capable of standing up for an argument or can you only resort to repetition?
2 Likes
It’s top tier in M+. Right now.
You’ve been repeating yourself for several years to no results. That’s really unfortunate man you only get one life and you’ve wasted so much of it on this.
I myself wondered if MSV Hunters were somehow coping with Physical Damage using a mechanism unique to the spec, something that made melee less punishing.
For years and years, Hunters avoided melee, too squishy. Now, for one spec, it’s all good. How? Maybe a really good parry rate? Dodge?
If this was made reality and RSV returned and BM became melee, do you really think those who attack MSV wouldn’t just switch to attacking melee BM?
1 Like
This is entirely on the back of the damage. I’m talking about mitigation. The fact that it remains so unpopular despite its damage advantage is extremely telling, but I’m willing to wait to see how things turn out when the tier sets get involved. In any case people in the know e.g. Limit Max have discussed Survival’s survivability issues and why it threatens Survival’s viability in any end-game content. But you don’t seem to know much of anything so it’s no surprise you resort to yet another thought-terminating one-liner.
2 Likes
Yes we absolutely would, because melee for Hunters is a bad and unwanted concept. It’s a hot potato of terrible design that no Hunter spec wants to be caught holding. Why are we sacrificing so much time and effort to appease a tiny niche of players who are so enamoured with melee combat that they can’t envision any spec being good without having to be in melee range for full damage?
4 Likes
So, it was far more simple to rip apart a spec, killing it off, that had all of its attacks about range dots. Than it would be to take a spec that only has three range abilities and have them be able to switch to melee, which would have also left SV range.
Blizzard had to build a spec from the ground up for there to be a melee spec. That a lot of time to waste when the easiest solution was to have BM be a melee/ range hybrid as it would have taken less work and not required a new spec to be implemented.
Think Blizzard even came to this realization with how they reworked SV after Legion to add in abilities that are copied from BM. Likewise, with adding additional range abilities it says that melee is not the best trait for hunters being that you do not want to be hindered by being stuck always in melee.
Bepples argument was melee gimps SV, which it does when you need to move out of a situation, like when you are up against a player that can stand thier ground. The convince of range is not having to be up in their face to attack that is SV strength is at, only having to be melee for two attacks while being able to stay back for 99% of the half.
2 Likes
If it was implemented in the way Watermist implied then no there wouldn’t be any ground for a complaint. You still have all three specs range with no changes, and one spec could play melee if anyone wished to.
How it would work is the other story as it would mean that range would be preferable to melee, and only a small number would play melee BM and as just a fun alternative to range. It would not be a optimal choice for hunters, but would give players more options for play-style choice.
Also, remember that if this had happened before Legion then no one would have lost a spec, but now that MSV exists this would be the worst solution for RSV to be brought back.
Your arguments aren’t worth more than that tbh.
It’s just flimsy, emotional ranting.
Why should anyone waste their time when you shut down your own arguments anyway lol
When 10.0 drops, SV will still be melee
1 Like