Now with an A+, B+, and C+.
TL;DW: Arms and WW strong, Fury is bottom, everything else can fit into niche comps.
2 Likes
I watched it, assessment seems to be pretty spot on.
2 Likes
He seems to be really really really generous to the bad specs. The gulf between Sub/FDK/Enhance and Sv Hunter is pretty oceanic to be represented by a single tier.
6 Likes
Enhance…A tier?
Yeah ikr, should definitely be S.
5 Likes
To be fair, he’s basing it off of how well or how many comps they can fit into.
Agree with everything but feral being too high IMO. Any comp that feral typically runs in is either with bad classes (hunter, warlock) or the classes they would want to run with dont want them (mage, spriest, even kitty cleave)
1 Like
Wdym fmpalla is insane rn?
9 Likes
Uh yeah, FMP is insane…
1 Like
Boys read what I said, I didnt say it was bad, What I said was those classes do not typically want to run with a feral. Mages would prefer to run with arms, WW, Rogues or spriest over a feral. FMP is probally ferals best comp but its not mages or hpal’s best comp. That make more sense?
2 Likes
That doesn’t mean the class is bad at all. That’s like saying enhance is bad because ret/warrior is better or ret is bad because warrior/mage is better. Or dk is bad because ww/mage is better. See where I’m going with this?
Legit awful tier reasoning
3 Likes
Classes are only as good as their best composition.
And arena tier lists are done on a relative basis.
If we take an over simplistic example: ww/mage is better than ww/dk or mage/dk then relatively speaking dk is worse than mage or ww and is thus “bad”. Though, provided they could still possibly win a match, they’d still be viable.
Nothing wrong with the tier reasoning.
3 Likes
Like, you ok in the head there?
No where did I say the class is bad, or even the spec. Stop projecting and really REALLY read what I typed. Read it slowly. Read it twice. three times to be safe. then get back to me with your results.
3 Likes
This is a very fair tier list. Not really stating some classes are bad, but more the utility of some of the others just make them more wanted. I.E. off healing.
I read it more than a few times. I think your take is awful, other classes having better comps is semi subjective as well. Fmpalla is rlly good into a lot of matchups, just as good as other mage/melee comps. It’s not hard at all for a feral to find qs.
I understand that you consistently have awful takes but try less hard to be a braindead dk player
2 Likes
No this isnt subjective, this is factual, otherwise at a higher rating people would be playing FMP consistently. Its a good comp, but there are better. Fact. Thats not an opinion.
Thats whats really scary tbh. You read it a few more times and somehow in your peanut brain it drew the same conclusion that it was a “Take” and not just saying the ladder state rn.
1 Like
There aren’t many ferals NA lol, especially ones that are good. Also representation argument LMAO
Representation argument is awful argument next slide
Fury bottom for another xpac. Sadge.
To be fair last time fury was good (first half of dread ssn) it was so disgusting and unfun to play against I think the majority of the player base would prefer it isn’t competitive for pvp
1 month of being A tier in s1 of an xpac pre-tuning/ bug fixes means a spec should never be good again? Fun.
1 Like