Square Enix fired a male victim of sexual harrassment

Toxic masculinity is not a valid, psycological concept that has any basis in real studies. It is used as a buzzword and an attack on what associated with traits commonly found in men.

Bro culture is another new age term, but one which I honestly can tolerate becoming a thing, unlike toxic masculinity, because masculinity can not be toxic only people can be. If toxic masculinity was a valid, psyological term, then toxic feminity would also be, and thus far, it is neither used as often or spread around as much despite what could be under the umbrella of toxic feminity is what causes most harm to women overall. But I digress.

Yes, men tend not to report abuse that much, and yes, it is in parts because no one in society takes men’s problems seriously - both men and women.

When men try to talk about men’s issues they are tackled by feminist groups.

When men try to set up something to help men, feminist groups attack it.

Whenever there is an attempt at appreciation for men, it is an attack on women (Fathers day having to be removed and instead be parents day because we should appreciate mothers too)

We have a long-lasting tendency to ignore male problems, homelessness, loneliness, psycological problems.

We make light of men’s fears, the Mike Pence rule, fear of false allegations, the consequences of a false allegation, marriage, child custody.

We tell men that they can not possibly understand the fear women have, of going outside due to them having a higher risk of being sexually assaulted, yet ignore that men are more likely to just be assaulted overall, and by random strangers on top of it too.

We ignore the consequences that broad strokes with a brush does to men, such as forcing young boys to rise up and apologise for sexual assault… kids. We ignore the total demonisation of men.

No, men’s issues are NOT taken seriously by neither man nor woman, and thank you for demonstrating this.

4 Likes

I normally like Jeremy, but that video has absolutely zero verifiable facts and I can’t find information on that story anywhere else.

So you think toxic masculinity isn’t a thing because toxic femininity isn’t a thing, but also that toxic femininity is a thing and it’s bad?

Okay.

Also I’ve never feared about women accusing me of sexual harassment, mainly because I don’t sexually harass women. It’s honestly quite easy.

Also no feminist groups ever attack men seeking abuse counciling or support. Feminists have been far more proactive in setting up shelters for men or helping men than any men’s rights advocates have ever done. MRA movement exists solely to hurt women, not to help men. They also hurt men in the process.

And literally no one is removing Father’s Day and is an absurd strawman mgtow fever dream.

Ya know, for a second, I rly thought you had a more nuanced opinion. Sad to be wrong, but not surprised.

1 Like

No, as mentioned, it is not a thing because it has no validity in psycology. Toxic masculinity is a buzzword, it is not a thing.

I am very sad that you are wrong.

As I said.

Thank you for demonstrating that no one truly cares about men’s issues.

2 Likes

No one cares less about men’s issues than men’s right activists.

No one cares at all.

2 Likes

Blizzard fanboys pulling out all the stops to try to distract what’s going on.

1 Like

Least of all you, as you wouldn’t be rambling about absurd lies like “they’re taking away Father’s Day!”

Feminists care a lot more about men’s well being than MRAs do. Shame you’ve turned them into your enemy.

The only people I’ve ever heard say men don’t get harassed or can’t get sexually assaulted were men…

That being said - wouldn’t surprise me if similar things were happening at all major companies and honestly, I hope all of them will get the same treatment Blizzard is getting.

They don’t.
People can’t care and deal with so many issues at the same time.

Feminists deals with women’s issues.
MRA deals with Men’s issues.

Sadly, the former has a tendency to attack the latter.

1 Like

i don’t know, only i knew that they have fetish to Chaos.

That’s where you’re wrong my man. Feminists attack MRAs, but they don’t attack men. MRAs attack feminists and also women in general.

1 Like

Nah, sorry I have to disillusion you again but even though (as we’ve found out earlier) you think I’m sexist, I actually just care about people in general.

My personal view of it is essentially… “I don’t care if it’s my son or my daughter who gets violated”. I don’t see a difference when it comes to this. It’s people egoistically and cowardly violating other people.

And I’ve actually been raising awareness for sexual harassment and assault of men and boys. I don’t think it’s a women’s issue, I think it’s everyone’s issue, cause it happens to both men and women way too often.

I just googled Square Enix sexual harrassment Kingdom hearts 3 and got several hits of results from more than the source I submitted for this post. There is also tons about it on Twitter from other sources. Instead of trying to attack this post and minimize it and do everything you can to set it aside so the focus can solely be on Blizzard. maybe tell yourself that we can talk about more than one thing at once without attacking each other all the time like you are doing. And you tell people do “do their homework before making claims like this” when nothing has even been proven in court with the blizzard thing. I hate when people say “do your homework” as if treating arguing on the internet and talking to strangers is equivalent to university research lol

1 Like

The problem with MRAs is that they’ve collectively turned into movements that are entirely reactionary rather than actually doing something for men.

It doesn’t help men to be mad about feminism.
Be mad about the male suicide rate or people telling men to shut up about their feelings or problems or the fact men and boys still get told to toughen up and “boys don’t cry” and aren’t protected by society.

I’d immediately support MRAs if they started actually doing something for men - possibly in a non-reactionary manner. Sure, if you go “yea women get sexually assaulted a lot BUT MEN” people will think you’re trying to minimize women’s experiences, but if you simply went “1 in 6 men get sexually violated” without even turning it into a weird competition of who suffers more, they wouldn’t think you’re trying to minimize women’s experiences.

Or leave the gender/sex stuff entirely out of it and just talk about people. Cause honestly, who cares if the person that gets violated is male or female?

2 Likes

so you take twitter as an accurate news source? lolololol

and sorry, I used YOUR search term; only got ONE hit: the one you originally posted, and it was archived from 3 years ago. not one single article from the major news outlets nor anything on the fact check sites, so, yeah: do your homework and do it well.

I know I should just walk away, but I just really want to chime in with my thoughts. (Please don’t be that person that quotes one sentence of my post and ignores everything else because you jump to a conclusion before you finished reading.)

I think that one of the things that needs to change to start really stopping sexual assaults is for corporations to feel that a non-internal (police or an outside investigator, though these are also not perfect solutions) dealing with any case is a better option then trying to cover it up and hope it never becomes a publicly known event. This is the same problem that so many church’s have, they are so worried about their reputation they hide sex crimes and punish victims hoping they can keep it from become public knowledge.

Once it is no longer the objective to cover it up as much as possible to protect reputation it instead becomes about finding out the truth of what happened and punishing the wrongdoer.

Sadly the problem is that the best and fastest way to do this is to remove most or maybe all (short of something insane like toilet stall camera’s.) privacy in work spaces and to remove most if not all personal interactions that are not required for the job, no more work dinners/lunches (at least outside of preapproved locations that are monitored) or working late with just a couple of people.

Doing this has a whole host of problems that comes with it and corporations. government, and the public at large will have to find some sort of collective consensuses of what privacy and personal interactions they are willing to give up for greater safety from any unwanted sexual advances or sexual assaults.

Anyways that’s just a brief summary of my thoughts about one aspect of how to deal with business centered sexual assault.

I have said my experiences with women are they are just a untrustworthy as men. Which does contradict your statement that ALL women treat ALL accusations of sexual abuse seriously.

All I have repeatedly stated is no, ALL women don’t. Some women are as dismissive as some men.

Blanket statement need not apply.

Dont care about that. The devs care about the player in ff14 and that is enough for me

2 Likes

Correct. No one will truly care.