Sure, as long as it doesn’t go to Priest.
Glad we agree.
1 Like
Not just mechanically, in lore. Void magic and Shadow magic are not different things. The cosmology chart literally has it as “Shadow(Void)”
And what do you consider the begining?
I mean if we are going to be pedantic because that’s all you have left.
Remember, I said I played my first warlock at the end of BC.
To my knowledge, that would hardly qualify as the “beginning”
Obviously, I’m aware they have their own theme. I don’t think a Sub Rogue and Unholy DK are the same because they are Shadow Damage but they add to the count of being Shadow theme DPS.
1 Like
I’m just playing the same game you are. You’re the one trying to be pedantic about what I typed, I’m only reminding you this cuts both ways & two people can play this game!
1.) beginning*
2.) I never said you played the Warlock class from day one. I have only ever implied that you have played Warlock and have played the game since the beginning.
Great going with this attempt though. Are you going to move on to something else now that this route has been thoroughly exhausted, or should I brace myself for you beating this horse to death?
But they’re not shadow themed, they just do shadow damage mechanically. Damage type is largely irrelevant at this point in the game. Blizzard could combine them all and just have it do “Magic” damage and basically nothing would change.
They are shadow theme lol.
That’s like saying Paladins aren’t Holy theme because they do Holy.
There is no point to be made when saying that. Do you think Disc Priest is irrelevant because their structure is about weaving Holy and Shadow despite their tree being a split in both schools?
1 Like
Oh? They made a Necromancer class in WoW while I wasn’t looking?
Paladins are holy themed because they’re holy themed.
Unholy DKs are death themed, not shadow themed.
In which does Shadow, so they are lol. They just have different themes and how to achieve that.
1 Like
You’re confusing mechanics with thematics.
Not really.
1 Like
If Blizzard changed Unholy’s damage type to holy and changed nothing else about it at all would it suddenly be a holy themed class?
I guess you don’t have anything left.
So let’s review…
I make the comparison of how Warlocks never had Immolation Aura as that was always a Demon Hunter thing and turns out I was mistaken, they infact did have Immolation Aura and then instead of actually addressing the point of the original owner of such an ability belonging to WC3 Demon Hunter, you incessantly hound me over a trivial matter that is no longer relevant because it’s non existent in modern wow and then you basically mock my knowledge for an ability that has both been removed and changed prior to its removal for nearly a decade now in insinuating that me not knowing the details regarding the matter as embarrassing even though I never played Demonology Warlock and the time I did play warlock amounts to a tiny fraction of game time over the course of 2 decades.
Then when I have to spend a relentless amount of effort in correcting your misunderstanding, you then claim I am being pedantic when you are using that in your own argument against me when you know full well what I said does not match your earlier response else why mock someone that has very little experience on a subject for getting a very trivial matter incorrect unless you are just an insufferable individual which we have already established.
Then when you got nothing left, you claim I am beating a dead horse when you are the one that brazenly disregarded obvious points of logic just to continue your own lore creation time.
Bravo 
1 Like
Obviously, granted it would be a puzzling decision lol.
I don’t think you understand what a class theme is.
Neither do you it seems
1 Like
Theme is about the lore behind the class. Not the mechanical damage type it does.
It can be both you know, otherwise Astral Magic would easily be accessed to all classes and not only Balance Druid stripping the spec of its identity.
That’s why I said it’ll be puzzling if they did what you asked…
2 Likes
SAYS THE ONE WHO THINKS A NECROMANCER IS ONLY A DUDE WITH A STICK AND ROBES.
I can’t think of anything more unimaginative than sticking with the very base of basics.
Where is YOUR creativity in expanding on that base of basics?
A necromancer with a sword and armor, sounds like a creative idea to me!
But apparently not to the fake “I’m the creative” who thinks only stick and robe can exist.
Death knights are necromancers, cry harder in being uncreative.
Death knights:
raise the dead and command them
Necromancer: raise the dead and command them
Death knights: Plague and Disease Spread
Necromancer: plague and decease spread
WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE?
“Well mine has a sthhick and robes and is therefore the only real necromancer”
get an imagination you FAKE.
Oh and another thing, liches, throughout all fantasy, have been notorious as the “Ultimate necromancer”
So yes, BEING AN UNDEAD NECROMANCER IS VERY NORMAL IN FANTASY.
Final edit, I looked up the definition of necromancer, GUESS WHAT IT SAYS?
“In fantasy, “necromancy” refers to the practice of magic that involves communicating with the dead, often by summoning their spirits to gain knowledge or control over them, usually considered a dark and powerful form of magic often associated with raising the undead or manipulating corpses to serve the caster.”
Hey look at that, A DEATH KNIGHT IS A NECROMANCER AFTER ALL.
4 Likes