Everything is always subject to change.
Tis the way of an ever evolving game.
Choice is definitely always nice, but unfortunately its not always the direction they go.
I know I for one was pretty upset when surv went melee and combat went outlaw forced 1 handers.
So I get it.
If I ever did keys again.
It’ll suck to no longer see someone in the party spaz out because a Hunter ran Barrage lol.
just sadly deleted my 2 MM hunters. this new spec sounds terrible.
Oh no. Its even worse than you think.
They removed it from mm… but… they BUFFED it for bm…
So if anything, its going to be even worse next season lol.
Enjoy a post I made in the hunter forums.
Does this mean you are going back on tour?
Talk about a dumb overreaction if true. Whose to say if the changes won’t get reverted. I have MM hunters that just dropped in priority to be played but even at 70 are worth plenty for doing trivial content like mog runs and stuff.
Why the hell does BM have it? A spec that’s about less shooting and more petting. And buffing it on top of that.
What on earth Blizzard? 
if they revert the changes and make MM enjoyable again, i can bring them back. technology is a wonderful thing.
I’m going to tell you the same thing people tell me when I whine about combat being deleted. “go play classic”
Amusing part. Only place people are pitching a fit is GD. Hunter forum seems to be ok with, even looking forward to the changes.
Most people don’t use the class forums.
Doesn’t say much.
Exactly what triggered my rage post lol.
As a bm hunter, I was appalled.
i agree wholeheartedly with everyone here that aff should get buffs
Thanks for the tip. I’ll be heading there now to post.
An Appeal to Authority is a subset of the more general Genetic Fallacy, which is when an argument is supported or dismissed based purely on its origin, regardless of the actual content of the argument. You’re ignoring the content of the argument and claiming that you’re just right because you say so, which is a genetic fallacy. And you attempt to support that by pointing to achievements and claiming that those make you an authority on the topic of hunter gameplay.
Copied straight from wikipedia:
The general form of this type of argument is:
Person A claims that X is true.
Person A is an expert in the field concerning X.
Therefore, X should be believed.
You (Person A) claim that your unsupported assertions (X) are true,
because you (Person A) are an expert on the topic of hunters (the field concerning X).
Therefore, we should believe your unsupported assertions (X).
You can’t get more clear than that.
Personally im more able to digest this than i was over the combat rogue and survival hunter changes
That isn’t what im doing. I don’t get your reliance on pointing out fallacies you can’t seem to properly identify
Comes off as …an appeal to authority
Seriously one of my pet peeves. Want to complain? Fine start the conversation. But holy crap take 2 seconds out of your life and throw a link up to add some context.
I don’t mind, but an eagle doesn’t really fit with the Dark Ranger undead theme.
They did mention in the Hunter Feedback thread that we’ll be able to change the Eagle’s appearance:
Room to Grow
This next step for Marksmanship is, ideally, the first of many. We are interested in continuing to flesh out Marksmanship’s Eagle as a true pet and partner for you on your journeys with unique interactions, effects, and even appearances in the future, but we don’t have specifics to share yet. We’d love to hear your thoughts!
Whether it’s just the color palette or entirely different animals - like bats or pterrodax - remains to be seen.