Live WoW is nothing like Classic.
Thing is, specs are easily changed and are a fundamental part of your character. So generally you can change them to suit the content. Covenants are different and everyone will know that you canât easily change them. They also donât impact your character that much, so anyone denying someone based off covenant choice are just being foolish.
None of us are Method, we donât need to worry about min-maxing to that degree. Just pick what you like and enjoy the game! Anyone that would ridicule you for your choice isnât worth playing with.
Yeah. Letâs be runescape too. You wanna be a mage, Druid, DK, etc all in one toon? Now you can oh wait thatâs not how things work and WoW is allowed to be different .
Night elves and Shadowmeld matter a lot actually.
Everyone will be able to participate in all forms of content regardless of the covenant you pick.
If I chose Night Fae and my PvP buttons became greyed out or something, you might have a point, but that wonât be the case.
Essentially the current way the system is going will force players to make a choice,â Iâm either going for aesthetic, or picking a covenant based on abilities that are best for one area of the game and being stuck with being subpar in every other aspect because of itâ heck even swapping specs isnât worth it for some of the covenants because the abilities will gimp one spec where it makes the other great
Terrible bad faith argument not even close to what he was saying. He simply wants flexibility between different areas of the game and not be at a significant disadvantage moving between each. Impressive lack of critical thought and ability to comprehend what youâre reading. Are you always such a ?
Missing the obvious point of the quote
Typical straw man comment, to be honest.
This has nothing to do with mutli-class functionality, all though lets be real, itâs so easy to have every alt max level they may as well do that.
Good. You can tell the casuals from the good players. And with how IL works now, we need all the systems that make it obvious who not to invite
Itâs not about participation, itâs about your character being the best it can be.
Why do these forums think thatâs a bad trait to have?
And in some cases itâs even about having fun. Remember that weird concept?
The warlock Night Fae ability looks so fun in dungeons and BGâs, but looks absolutely terrible and boring in arena and single target raids.
Personally I think casuals should be rewarded extra item levels so that they can be on the same level as mythic raiders and cutting edge content clearers as yourself it just isnât fair and ruins the gameplay experience to be at such a disadvantage
Glad to see arena hasnât hit you so hard that you can still type
No, your point was some streamer told you that gatekeeping races happens in classic so you believe itâll happen in live WoW based on covenants.
As if that doesnât already happen with specs/AOTC/raideri0
Itâs not, but you can still do good with any of the covenants. Thatâs my point.
they gonna make it outdoors only. 100%
But you canât be your best.
A lot of people like to be their best, hence the existence of sims, guides, BiS lists, etc etc.
Tbh, if youâre not choosing vampires for the aesthetic anyway, that says a lot about your character too. Itâs a good thing theyâre giving the best house, the best ability
A lot of you seem to be negative just so you can be, the point we are trying to make is that the system will essentially punish you for your choice unless it is the good choice, if the system went into place exactly how it is now the player base would feel punished if they donât choose venthyr. Which essentially is taking away player choice, there is no such thing as choice if your options are 3 subpar and 1 obviously vastly better.
Letâs be real, none of us are going to be playing at the level where it matters too much. Too many people here seem to think theyâre Method and need to adopt Methodâs, well, methods. If my covenant does 90k DPS in one area and another covenant would have given me 100k DPS, thatâs totally fine.