I do appreciate Ion reducing PF for steady flight for certain. Hes definitely taking the game in better directions the last two expansions. Much respect for that.
Just really odd to have the OP come in making some petty requests and having the same old names show up to cause a ruckus about something so blatantly irrelevant that Ion has made PF pretty much pointless
1 Like
Hopefully the powers that be shut it down. It’s literally old news after the release of the expansion.
(Also should address posters who are using alts to argue with specific people to abuse the silence system. There is evidence of that earlier in the thread)
1 Like
The energy and momentum is with those that have a love for TBC normal flying and the accessibility and options that it offers.
Segregation of TBC normal flying behind pf has never been popular.
1 Like
there will be more expansions. If this gets attention now then maybe that drastically reduced PF just goes away entirely. I think thats the thing some are asking for.
1 Like
Asking a very basic question in line with the thread is evidently a distraction now. Good to know.
Yes, yes, I understand that you can’t answer the question and pivoted to deflections. We already cleared that up ages ago.
You win. I don’t have the capacity to argue with someone as dense as yourself. Good luck.
The irony.
3 Likes
lol…you being given a very clear and relevant response that you dont want to accept I think is the issue here.
You asked, I responded withthe only answer youre gettng…thats pretty much the end of the exchange.
1 Like
Well, I think we just found out on that front.
By far the 2 loudest voices in this thread claiming that it’s an issue admitted that neither has any disability that impacts gameplay.
5 Likes
I am this days old when I remember that everyone assumed that PF would require level cap and completing pf achieve I warned people that nothing is final and nothing is set in stone and I as others were proving right.
But pf has changed many times based on player feedback and lessened before imminent release. This is why feedback matters and why these forums exist.
oh you caught on to that too did you? I was pretty obviously making a comparison to this thread/forum , so Im glad you made the connection
huh…that would be the third person plural…pretty much learn it before preschool lol.
1 Like
The truth is that the discussion goes
Party 1: Skyriding is difficult for people with disabilities
Party 2: I have this disability and this is what I’ve done to cope with skyriding and it’s not longer a problem
Party 3: how could you be so HEARTLESS and CARELESS about this accessibility issue! I bet blizzard is going to be sued for discrimination in the European Union! DO YOU HEAR ME ION!! You will remove Pathfinder!!
And then 30 days of nothing and then a new thread about disabilities and skyriding by a random alt followed by Party 3 back to argue.
There’s really no point in even getting upset about it anymore. I’m honestly blown away Lio even puts in the effort because you know they are going to remove the requirement for steady flight anyway because there’s literally no point in gatekeeping it.
1 Like
That isn’t how the discussion goes.
More like just remove pf requirements and the discussion goes away. Easy win for BlizZard.
Perhaps the problem here is that it’s not about winning for Blizzard.
Blizzard made a dynamic flying system and it’s way better than the old one. It’s more fun, more efficient, and more engaging. It is reasonable for them to expect people to engage with that flight system on the first go-around.
1 Like
I suppose you think restaurants should not try to accommodate food allergies too right? You probably hate handicap ramps at buildings. You’re a good dude.
3 Likes
It’s gonna happen anyway I don’t understand the point of an involuntary forum vacation just to prove a point lol. The whole reason Lio even trolls people in here is because it bumps the thread and they can point to a 1000 post thread about how pathfinder sucks. I appreciate the game at this point.
That makes no sense because for many disabled players TBC normal flying is more fun, efficient and more engaging.
In fact I am not disabled and I find that TBC normal flying is better suited for the smaller maps of TWW with quests clustered in small areas where pin point landing and hover shines for TBC normal flying with how TWW world questing circuit is designed.
So you have your opinion but watch this… I disagree.
My opinion is that TBC normal flying fits like a glove for the very small TWW maps.
If BlizZard was serious about supporting dragon riding they would have made larger maps to showcase its strengths compared to TBC normal flying.
2 Likes
I don’t know the nature of OP’s disability, but he/she uses click to move, which may imply that one of the hands is disabled. In that case, I suggest using an MMO mouse with side buttons, like the Logitech G600, and bind the skyriding controls to those side buttons. It gives full skyriding control without even having to touch the keyboard at all, allowing you to skyride completely one-handed. That’s what I do, and it feels great. But yes, I agree that old fashioned steady flying should be available immediately alongside skyriding.
Full disclosure: I do not have any physical disabilities.
In fact they advertise such advantages to appeal to a wider audience range.
Okay, but why? Is it because it’s a superior form of flying, or is it because it’s less demanding of the player?
I don’t have an issue with the existence of TBC flying, but the focus shouldn’t be on whether or not TBC flying should be available. It should be on Blizzard developing a more robust accessibility menu that makes it easier for people with disabilities to engage with skyriding.
That is true advocacy for accessibility options, not this performative nonsense about how TBC flying is the de facto accessibility option. It’s almost insulting to suggest disabled people get TBC flying when it’s inarguably an inferior option for playing the game.
1 Like
I mean…it’s Lio. This is who they are as a person.