Can we pleaseeee take another look at how to make SMF viable or how to transmog 1h as fury warriors? The quelserrar blades back in the trading post have me drooling over the transmog potential. Just make it not a talent point anymore so it’s not nerfed by wasting a talent to obtain and then make it a simple flat damage % buff that can be tuned until it’s in line with titans grip. You got rid of annihilator so there’s no special build for faster weapons anymore anyways. Please. Let me transmog dreams come true.
19 Likes
But protection warriors need you!
It would probably never be “viable,” if by that you mean competitive. The stats on 2h weapons are just too high. 1 talent point doesn’t seem too huge for just a fun spec. I wish we got something like that for the old Gladiator Stance. Still miss that.
1 Like
Their vision of Fury Warrior uses 2 2-handers.
Sort of like how if you use a shield you’re a tank.
Unfortunate but it is what it is.
3 Likes
But dual wielding 2-handers is what makes us unique… among being the closest thing you can get to a Berserker in WoW.
1 Like
I am pretty upset that they screwed us out of what used to be signature for Fury. It worked fine as a passive when they first gave people a choice. No reason it can’t again.
2 Likes
You do realize that this is newer and not how Fury has always been? And that there’s nothing wrong with choices, right?
6 Likes
I never said that there was anything wrong with choice?
Fury in Vanilla still had titans grip, being the only class to dual-wield 2-handers. Otherwise you’re just a glorified combat Rogue with Rage instead of… I forgot their resource.
Once again, not saying anything is wrong with it, but of all the things Fury had/have that made/make it unique, that’s what had stood out the most.
1 Like
by “newer” you mean for the last 16 years?
SMF will never be able to be competitive unfortunately, but if you just want to play it, play it
4 Likes
Who cares? If people want to use SMF, why not let them? Why be against what someone wants?
There’s no reason SMF shouldn’t be a viable option.
3 Likes
Do you keep missing the point where I haven’t argued or disagreed with you once about choice? You’re arguing with yourself…
3 Likes
So why are you in here telling people what you think is better if you don’t care how they play?
Also TG wasn’t added until Wrath 3.1 and we were still viable when not using it.
2 Likes
Either you’re trolling or you’re very dense. See my original post
Whatever you thought I implied, you we’re wrong. I literally stated something and never once said you should or have to play any way. So once again, never disagreed or was against choice.
3 Likes
I think they should unlock mog options.
Not sure if they can balance SMF though.
2 Likes
SMF was removed for a reason. It cannot be balanced.
Asking for mog options isn’t unreasonable imo.
2 Likes
Ah, the patch that I began playing WoW!!
1 Like
i mean, it wasn’t removed, its still there
3 Likes
So you came in here to be dismissive and give your opinion without anything to actually add to the conversation? Because that’s what this is if your opinion didn’t infer people should just play TG, because you think it’s superior.
The conversation is about making something viable. If you have nothing to add on that, then that’s okay. But let’s not be dismissive towards those who do enjoy it. Have a good day.
If that’s the last desperate route to go, I’d be fine with that too.
2 Likes
Functionally, yes it was. Nobody plays it because TG always outperforms. It may as well not even be in the game.
i’m sure some people who hate TG play it, so i wouldn’t say nobody
a lot of this game doesn’t need any optimization