Not according to Blizzard. Though you are, in fact, limited to 1 toon at a time. Hence, why you need multiple accounts to multi-box.
Yes, because the only thing preventing you from doing it is your own attitude towards it.
1 Like
I guess weâre not going to count money? I donât think itâs very fair that somebody who spent more money gets an advantage over me.
2 Likes
But donât you get it? Itâs OK because âeveryone can do itâ.
1 Like
Is it unfair that some could put in more hours than you?
When playing in an online MMORPG? Yeah, Pay to Win is an embarrassing road to go down and condone.
1 Like
How is putting in more hours P2W?
No because at the end of it I will be at the same level as them whether they like it or not, but no matter how much time I spent in game I canât get around that advantage that comes with spending real money no matter how hard I tried.
1 Like
Youâre just tossing poo at a wall hoping something sticks at this point.
1 Like
Iâve got Blizzard backing my stance. What have you got?
Ah, âBlizzardâs Backingâ. Accepting your money in order to turn a blind eye to your lameness. Pretty strong âbackingâ youâve got there. Maybe boxing matches should have unlimited opponents. I mean, since everyone can do it should be âfairâ.
I have ethics, self respect and sense of fair play.
1 Like
Thatâs against the rules. Unlike multi-boxing.
What was that about throwing poo to see what sticks?
But no argument to support how multi-boxing is unethical.
![:+1:](https://d38bqls1q93fod.cloudfront.net/en/wow/images/emoji/twitter/+1.png?v=6" ":+1:")
Which doesnât mean a thing when Blizzard flat out says that your sense of fair play is incompatible with what their sense of fair play is.
1 Like
How about the one I listed where it makes it so the game isnât about skill but rather how much money you spent? Imagine if in sports if one team was able to spend more money to have extra players on the field while the other couldnât it isnât fair and thatâs part of what ethical means.
1 Like
The fact that you require any further âargumentâ to explain unethical play to you speaks volumes about your character. No pun intended.
No that just means that Blizzard values money over ethics.
1 Like
Not an ethical problem, because, again, the characters involved end up in the same place (max level, geared up, etc.). And, again, there are numerous other situations where someone will be at a distinct disadvantage even with no extra money involved.
Example:
20-character Horde raid against 5 Alliance players
20-character Horde multi-boxer against 5 Alliance players
The Alliance players are at a disadvantage in both situations. Nothing was done to violate any rules either.
In NASCAR⢠a team can spend however much money it wants to deck out its vehicles and train its drivers. Some teams have put WAY more money in than their competitors. Sometimes these teams win, sometimes they donât. No rules were broken but there was an advantage to those that put in more money.
1 Like
There it is! When you canât attack the argument attack the person. GG.
2 Likes
That is simply called âlifeâ. And sadly, life is not fair.
You have no argument beyond âblizzard collects my moneyâ. You assassinated your own character by attempting to legitimize multiboxing.
But wasnât the argument that it was âfairâ because everyone can do it?
1 Like
Uh yeah it is an ethical problem because it goes against whatâs fair a person who spends more money has an advantage over somebody who doesnât. Whether something is against the rules has nothing to do with something being ethical thatâs why rules and ethics donât mean the same thing. The difference between those two scenarios is that the first one wasnât an advantage gained through real world money the Alliance players could gather more Alliance players while in the second scenario the horde is going to win only because they spent money which isnât fair to the Alliance who didnât spend money.
Rules are not ethics.
Can those teams use money to put extra drivers on the road? No because then it wouldnât be fair.
1 Like