I cited something.
Get your own copy. I don’t have to provide one for you. I know you can’t heal, but I’m sure you can find text from a book if you try.
Page 84, bottom right 3rd to last paragraph.
You cited an entire book broadly, and if you don’t actually provide it as open source, no one has to treat it as anything other than “Dude Trust Me”
Oh and the 2nd Edition of the guide says you’re wrong. You can’t keep relying on the 1st edition from 3 days prior… just sayin’
I just gave you the page number and paragraph.
Source? I have that book too.
Or are you making stuff up still, 2nd? You have a bad habit of doing that.
Of a book I don’t have access to… so you’ll have to provide the evidence or you’re just lying.
Same source you’re using.
It’s $5. But you live in denial so don’t buy it.
Now someone is getting upset for getting called out on all their fibbing.
/headpat
Don’t worry, I’m sure someone believes your non-Blizzard definition is real.
Confused maybe, but not upset. You don’t have a good sense of irony or hypocrisy do you?
Does someone hold your hand to the bathroom? You sound extremely immature denying the citation I provided. “i’M nOt cOmPeTnT, hOw Do yOu fInD bOokS?”
…no? Creepy much?
You cited a book, without proof, and without verification. Just as you can’t hide all your authorities behind paywalls, you can’t hide your support behind a for-profit book that only pays Blizzard a royalty fee because they get to use the names and likenesses of their IP.
Don’t worry. If you ever grow up to do big boy research, you’ll understand this.
Why do you constantly feel the need to make up rules?
I gave you a citation. Even said the page and paragraph. It’s in a book that was mass published and distributed. If anyone sounds like a liar in here it’s not the person quoting a book that sold throughout the states. It’s the one trick druid that hasn’t provided any sources on anything they’ve said.
Anyone who has the book, can read what I cited and read what you’re saying. You refuse to see it so therefore it doesn’t exist. Does peekaboo scare you too?
Oh wow… you really think you get to cite things as proof that people have to pay to see?
Okay serious moment: this isn’t how anything remotely resembling scholarship, research, or proof works. I’d get penalized rather stiffly by any judge that caught me using paywall blocked citations or articles, mostly out of the sheer annoyance it causes to try to verify anything stated or quoted is actually accurate. The same goes for a variety of other endeavors, such as academic research.
You’re arguing in an open, public, and free platform. You want to be taken seriously, you need to provide sources that are the same, otherwise you’re just masking authority behind a paywall that even if paid may or may not actually prove anything at all.
You can claim you’re citing accurately from a book that exists, but you provide no proof of such other than your word that such a citation exists and exists in the way you claim it exists. You’re just pulling a “Dude Trust Me” citation.
Ya… I got a graduate degree and never had to do any of those made up things.
A citation is a citation. I’m not writing a thesis here 2nd.
Sorry the books not public domain? That doesn’t discredit it’s authenticity at all though. It just shows your capabilities.
Speaking of lies…
It does when you can’t verify it in the slightest. You’d know this if you had actually done anything post-graduate.
I take it back, you could have gotten a post-doc in something useless and research-free or at least rigorous research-free… don’t mean to malign your master’s in education… (actually I do because they’re useless but eh, at least it is post-doc)
Weren’t you just denying that’ its an Official Guide at all a few post ago? Moving goalpost.
The book does exist. Now go use that brain and read.
You’re snobby. You come here to try and reason that you’re better then others but you’re not. You’re subpar. You suck a resto. You’re just angry that other people can have fun because you clearly can’t enjoy anything anymore.
Calling something an “Official Guide” doesn’t make it so.
I know… never said it didn’t. I just said you have no proof of your supposed quotations.
Calling a masters in education useless is not snobby. It is an objective fact.
Dude, that’s what you are doing through the title of this thread. That and the fact that you’ve arbitrarily assigned taking the most damage as being the definitive attribute of a what a “tank” is.
This is a fantasy MMO.
Yup, because WoW is real life, right?
My argument was based on yours. So, does this mean your arguments are made up now?
That’s the actual title. It’s not made up.
I gave you the citation. Sorry you aren’t capable.
It is. You’re snobby. One trick druid that can’t play resto.
That’s according to Blizzard. Not me.
Kind of? You are spending real time playing a video game. Those players above actually had a Shaman tank. You keep dreaming up scenarios that have not happened.