Yes, and I need closure that have not yet been given. And I can only hope that Blizzard delivers. But I’m sure you’ll be here to complain when that happens.
1 Like
If your cloture is getting to crap on the horde playerbase just so you can get your jollies off, then yeah, I’m not going to like it, no.
They need only prove to themselves? Whether or not someone is evil isn’t really something that can be left to the individual in question, otherwise no one would be evil because no one would call themselves evil. Whether someone is evil or not is determined by those around them and the results of their own actions as well as the context for having taken those actions.
Then allow me to clarify. The Horde does not need to prove anything to the Alliance. Period.
12 Likes
Then it simply does not matter that the Centaur were Cenarius’ grandchildren.
Who determines what is “enough”? You? The Alliance posters that aren’t as rabid as some of the NEFPA? The NEFPA themselves?
7 Likes
That is always the strange thing about posters who like to use Stormheim to justify the War of the Thorns, as very often those same posters will say that Genn had no right to action over his grudges from Gilneas due to the treaty after the Siege of Orgrimmar, but they overlook that by that same logic that Sylvanas had no right to action over any grudges from Stormheim due to accepting the hope for peace at Arathi.
8 Likes
The alliance literally broke the treaty right then and there by bringing in an usurper to the throne who immediately tried to start a rebellion lol.
2 Likes
I think it does if you care about overall order of things, but you’re the one who seems to tag some narrative into it.
That’s actually the same logic I was coming from when I wrote that. I think Genn should have given that up by the time the post-SoO treaty came out (although the land should have been bargained back, at least). But so should have Sylvanas by agreeing to what was supposed to be a peaceful meeting after her own thing.
2 Likes
But he is right. I’m sure you wouldn’t be so easy to disregard his words if it was a night elf.
Apparently being pandaren makes his observations invalid.
Please let’s not leave it to them. They require nothing less than total extermination of the horde and they cry about the Kaldorei no longer being this mythical Vicious unstoppable army who can solo anything and everything ever.
Nothing will ever be enough for them.
14 Likes
Certainly not you, since you would give Alliance players nothing of value. And yes, keeping what lands we had while still losing this much is nothing.
Show me where I have said that, even in passing.
1 Like
What is NEFPA? Night Elf Furious Posting Association?
2 Likes
Wasn’t talking about you.
It just proves how Sylvanas just want the War for her own benefits.
Stormheim was just one argument to bring Saurfang on board.
The actual difference between the two is that the “Hope for Peace in Arathi” happened in a book, whereas the post-Siege treaty is at least mentioned occasionally in-game.
The actual game that we’re playing gave absolutely no hint that any kind of peace had set in.
1 Like
Well he was talking to me. And he would rather that we got nothing than any type of closure.
We’ll get some type of closure hun. I’m just afraid none of us are going to like whatever BS blizzard pulls out their rear concerning Sylvanas. 
Rather the opposite, as you are the one caring enough to ascribe some narrative to it when there is none, as I specifically even pointed out already:
Especially given the Centaur killed their own father immediately upon being born and then carried on their mother’s Old God corruption of the land.
1 Like