You need to hold up a mirror to yourself.
You are everything you seem to have problems with and take it out on others.
This is a broad question.
This is specific criteria as an answer to a broad question. But what it is not is a specific answer to a specific question.
But then you walk it back with thisâŚ
This being a specific answer to a specific question that I do not ask. You inserted your own question to answer because you did not âcomprehendâ the question.
You are making a broad statement but in a way where you are trying to make it about a specific criteria which in this case is the AOE aspect. But that both was not in my question nor in your answer.
If you had better reading comprehension skills and you were âexactâ and âpreciseâ then you would have provided the proper answer. But instead you walked it back once I displayed how folly your answer was.
This is why extremes exist and why they are helpful. They are a way to measure the path/trajectory you are on and where it will eventually lead if you let it play out.
I put forth such a case and you knowingly or not just walked right through it because you are too focused on authority in âstatusâ instead of genuine ideas.
There is a saying, smart people learn from their mistakes, wise people learn from the mistakes of others.
This means that you do not have to have the same experience as someone else to come to the same conclusion and come up with a possible solution.
Or we can look at Isaac Newtons quoteâŚ
âIf I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.â
Meaning we can achieve much because of what came before. I donât need to follow in the same footsteps at someone else to come to the same conclusion, I merely have to work where they left off.
So your constant position of authority is just flat out wrong. Just because YOU cant make heads or tales unless you experience first hand does not mean OTHERS suffers from that limitation.
So back to my position, I have a different view⌠but my view is NOT related to lack of experience as you want so bad to believe. It is just a different way to look at the situation and come to a different solution.
What you want is to force me to agree with your position because you think I lack âsomethingâ and if you can only convince me that I do indeed âlack somethingâ then I can come around to see your point by submitting to your authority.
Stop using status and experience to judge positions.
Judge the ideas themselves separate from the person saying them.
Once again, you are demanding that I give you a response that you want.
I gave the response I gave because YOU have your idea. fine cool. but I have my idea. fine cool. We each have ideas. I DO NOT CARE about your idea when I LIKE MINE MORE.
I only comment about things that I think are BROKEN and need FIXED or addressed. That is why I comment on your AOE idea because it will cause issues. I have nothing to say on your other ideas because I just have a difference of opinion. THAT IS A VALID ANSWER. Get off your high horse if you think and demand otherwise, YOUR NOT GETTING IT.
YES
It is on the writer to make clear and concise material.
You need 2 things for a good design or in this case writing.
You need ACCURACY
You need CLARITY
I take no issue with ACCURACY.
But the CLARITY could have been improved.
Your format sucks when you are trying to SEPERATE out points. You cant honestly think it cant be improved do you?
They way it was written, it all bled together. The ideas were so similar and you were not clear on one vs the other because from the outside looking in, I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS IS YOUR MIND. So I can only put what I was given together and come up with the best output I could given the content.
But even if your clarity was good or you think it was at least, that still does not justify your response in starting the personal attack and beginning of your attempt at character assassination.
That is equivalent to saying something on social media and someone says your writing sucks and then going after that person to get deplatformed and discredited and ostracized from society to be treated like a pariah.
Legitimate criticism was offered and you decided to take it the wrong way and go all crazy about it calling me a troll and sad and pathetic.
You instigated this entire derailment. I was only a passenger on the ride refusing to get up off my seat.
If I was told my writing was difficult to understand, I would be thankful and I would see how I can improve. I would rewrite it and see if it helps the reader because its about the reader more than the writer. So its the writers role to cater to the reader.
But then again, I actually care about making clear and concise points.
Just because I called you out for instantly going the troll route when you received criticism you didnât expect nor appreciate. Again, grow up.
You felt that derailing the topic⌠YOUR topic was the right call and justified because I didnât give you the response you were looking for? And you still think you are not demanding the right response? So what, you donât get what you want and decide to derail your entire thread? Are you treating your thread like a hostage and if your demands are not met then you take one out?
Bravo /clap
I donât care what you think you did or what your opinion is or how you classify damage as pointless or not. I explained my stance in a general term and at least one of your examples fit the criteria that I see as damage for damage sake.
And just so we can be âClearâ and âConciseâ and âexactâ this is what I am talking aboutâŚ
^ Damage for damage sake. That is not needed. That is not interesting. That is boring and dull.
Probably others, but you get the point.
DAMAGE FOR DAMAGE sake is boring. There is no interaction with what you written there. It doesnât change anything regarding making a spell do something different or prioritizing a different spell use.
You cant force someone to give you the feedback you want when I just donât have anything to say or flat out just donât like the direction. Deal with it.
