1 Like
He got me real good. It seemed too real at first but it’s 100% bait, got me
1 Like
we are talking about human nature, and your lack of self-awarenss
This word doesnt mean what you think it means.
You are talking about human nature. I am talking about Blizzard’s Art Department designing a Flying Book Mount for the Cash Shop.
We are having different conversations.
so, you understand you lack self-awareness?
That’s a good first step.
3 Likes
Oxford says it means exactly what I think it means.
What’s your definition?
Obviously not, as it would require keen self-awareness to understand a lack of self-awareness.
there is something to be said about hostility towards people that are casual gamers that enjoy easy calming gameplay that isn’t irritating or frustrating. even in WoW, a game that got popular from inviting all sorts of people from a casual sphere to the gaming world has this rampant toxic hostility and gatekeeping mindset towards casual play.
2 Likes
but I am SUUUUPER casual. All I do is WQ for anima… and I still did it. I’m literally wearing questing gear and I don’t care for better gear in the slightest.
There’s a difference between being casual and being bad.
And there’s a difference between understanding what is attainable, and what isn’t, and knowing that you don’t deserve everything just for participating.
1 Like
Where is your statement that follows from another statement?
“Tying a book mount into a challenge mode encounter” is what you call a non-sequitur. There is no logical relation anywhere, because there are no two statements that are connected. Its simply not applicable. “Not tying a book mount into a challenge mode encounter” is just the same.
Its like calling bread an oxymoron. It doesnt make sense.
I am not salty … but I would indeed buy a cool new duo mount from the cash store. I am thinking a Flugtag inspired occupant powered flying item. it would of course be a combined goblin gnome project …
And the worst part is people like this:
That’s like saying, “but I am SUUUUPER vegetarian. All I do is eat salads… and I still had steak for dinner.”
If they do challenges, they ain’t the same sort of casual I am. We need different names, because we are NOT the same.
1 Like
I’m not in either of those categories D: I prefer normal/kinda hard difficulties. My goal when playing a game is to play on the “intended” difficulty and tailor my experience towards that rather than make the game so easy that I fly through it in 3 hours or so hard that I’d rather go to sleep than play the game. It gives me a better appreciation for the game when I play it on such a difficulty rather than focusing on ease or making my game experience a living hell.
You don’t make sense.
It’s a non-sequitur because a mount designed to be free for everyone and themed around books/lore/story is now being awarded via the hardest solo challenge in the game. It’s weird, nonsensical, and does not logically follow.
2 Likes
The bait you keep biting has long been eaten but you keep biting… o boy.
Overwriting all my forum history because of stalkers harassing on multiple platforms. Blizzard won’t let us delete history to avoid targeted harassment.
2 Likes
I think this post is disgusting and shows why we can’t have nice things in a nice game. People are lazy and just want to buy buy buy instead of doing some mechanics and playing the game… you know the thing you pay a sub for. Why even bother w/ a game if you don’t want to play it?
1 Like
that’s not even a remotely similar analogy.
If I only play a few hours a week, and don’t do any group content. I’m casual.
Being unable to complete a challenge despite playing allday / everyday doesn’t make you casual, it makes you bad.
I pay a sub to fish and role-play while showing off my shiny mounts, toys, and gadgets. Everything that requires doing mechanics annoys me and the only reason I do any of it is to collect more stuff to utilize when I’m role-playing, fishing, and exploring the world.
3 Likes