“it’s the most popular because it’s the most popular” is what you just said 
1 Like
I lol’d hard.
Epic slam dunk
Did I ask a proof of MC raid ? Or is MC raid is the best raid you have done and that’s where all of your “all classes are viable” comes from ?
No dude. It’s the most popular because the warrior class is a laughably common concept that resonates with most gamers today in any game that uses class design.
You’re just coping and attaching a reasoning to your emotion
1 Like
Sorry I missed this.
Lots of classes can fill more than one raid role. Im not disagreeing here but if a dps warriors output was second or third tier could anyone be making that argument?
I only ask because at some point we need to address the decade in which this game was designed, created and launched and the decade we are currently in and finding out that WoW wasnt perfect which no one accused it of in 2005 or 2020.
You are wrong, the fact warrior is not the most popular in retail and wotlk atm because they are weak and undesired.
Wow players play the classes that have easiest accesses to raids or the content they are interested in.
Stop smoking weeds.
No evidence of this.
Never said otherwise. It’s not from a lack of trying though.
Precisely. Thats because they’re a generation apart so unless your complaint can somehow be retroactively applied to 18 years ago you don’t really have a legitimate complaint - just petty gripes to go with your sour grapes.
“warts and all”
“Classic isn’t for everyone”
Someone didnt get the memo.
It’s afraid.
Not really. That’s a different turbo nerd furry game that nobody cares about. Come back down to earth, back to vanilla/EQ/D2 and other games of their time. Where classical classes prove time and time again warrior style classes are preferred . If the other classes in retail are melee beat sticks that are better than warrior than of course they’re picking them. If they essentially fill the warrior role.
(See death knight)
Stop using other games (retail) to prove your case for vanilla.
2 Likes
That’s where you insert your evidence, not your 2nd grade snark.
2 Likes
Please define “viable”.
I don’t want to play a game where warriors are weak and undesired. Warriors are the meat and potatoes of WoW. They gotta be good and there’s gotta be a lot of em.
You are copiuming hard and denying reality.
From the dictionary: Capable of working successfully. Feasible.
1 Like
“I have ran out of excuses so I’m just gonna say nuh-uh” is all I read
If some retail class can mimic a melee beatstick that does it better than a warrior then that new class fills the warrior/barbarian/fighter preference of the player
You know I’m right
You know you’re wrong
1 Like
I don’t want the dictionary definition because the dictionary isn’t speaking in the context of WoW classes. I want to know how you apply the word in the context of bringing classes to WoW raids.
This thread is lit btw
1 Like
Can the classes clear whatever dps threshold is required by the raid to feasibly clear content.
so you’re saying that “viable” is a relative term, in this context?