I’m sure you would not tell outright lies, so I guess you must be developing memory problems. Is there a history of Alzheimers in your family?
Just to jog your poor memory, here is the original mention of this topic in this thread. You might note your statement that Horde were complaining.
You’ve made it clear, (by posting a non-complaint by an Alliance player instead,) you cannot support your claim, so why not give it a rest?
If you continue derailing this thread with untruths I will not answer further, I will merely report for trolling.
I’ve flagged him for trolling several times already and will continue to do so every time I see him trolling. He posts in a popular thread so he can be sure that he’ll be heard, just flag him and move on. If you don’t feed the troll, eventually he will go away…
That being said, the removal of the portals was just another nail in WoW’s coffin lid, it’s getting nailed down tighter and tighter with everything ActiBlizz/the dev team takes away from it.
Why would they dig down and not use that room where those little peons are locked up. And why are those peons locked up?
Don’t get your hopes up. Based on where they put COT on alliance side they are not planning to return the rest. They just didn’t have room for that portal in the main room.
I wasn’t thrilled about it, but I wasn’t “offended”.
Not at all. In context your point was “horde had to travel further to get to the farm, is the same as us having to travel further now because of portal removal.”. And it’s not. 50sec vs 60sec on one travel party is not the same as arbitrarily adding 3 minutes or more to many destinations.
Ah, I see how it is, you preemptively accuse me of removing the context so that you can blithely ignore it yourself and think yourself immune from getting called on it.
Is it too much to ask that they actually ADD something too it? I’ve commented off and on since cata (occasionally here) that the return portal from uldum has been a glaring oversight. Every other zone in cata had a return portal, except that one.
I asked people if I missed a quest or something, and apparently, it never got added in. Much like those missing raids. The old dev team missed a beat now and then…but at least they didn’t focus on gutting quality of life features like there was an end of year bonus for removing the most of them.
Because they wanted a “good” reason not deny players more convenience in the future:
“Well, we wanted to give you guys more portals…but as you can see, there’s just no ROOM! Sorry, not sorry. Feel free to give us more feedback for the circular file!”
I can tell you how it is decreasing the playerbase and making the game worse. And that is the point of this thread. If you can’t look at a change and say thats amazing, then it probably isn’t a change worth implementing.
i can’t prove it was an alliance player at the time of posting.
I supported the claim by finding a thread from over half a decade ago, where it clearly shows that it was a thing… do you think that one poster was the only one to bring it up?
It was a clear example of how people are upset at how far they have to travel, (even when portals to everywhere exist) and how people will find anything to complain about, no matter how trivial.
for the people calling me a troll, be aware that what Jops was responding to here, was not my quote.
(so you not only remove the context, you’re now trying to completely change it)
not allowed to say things unless you can prove it … remember?
the rest of your post makes you sound like a horrific racist.
Considering the amount of people who are leaving based on their posts in this thread because this is their final straw (because of a long string of poor decisions on the part of the devs), you can objectively measure the decrease in the game’s playerbase…one player at a time.
While the devs themselves have a more accurate count of that because of their birds eye view, someone with a lot of time and a spreadsheet could do some analytics and track the outflow of subs and discontent across the forums from wod to now.
This, is basic business practice. Unless you are intentionally sabotaging your product, similar to the old henry ford junkyard story (not sure of that’s true or one of those urban legends), you don’t go out of the way to intentionally make calls you know aren’t working for your business. Like trying to pad the metrics, a move their own reports are telling them is a losing strategy.
One you said wasn’t relevant…yet you keep the issue going. And before you say “but someone else is the one posting!” I’ll point out that you also keep bringing up the issue of “I can’t prove it wasn’t an alliance poster at the time of posting.”
If it’s “not relevant” like you keep saying…drop it. Don’t respond to it and actually answer a question related to the topic, like:
That’s an interesting supposition, let’s check in with…
I guess not. Looks like you need some proof, by your own standards.
that is me, but that wasn’t what you quoted, and wasn’t what i was referencing.
I was referencing the post where you’ve taken something you said, and made it look as if i said it.
No, IN CONTEXT, you’re taking something which was said in a different paragraph, and trying to marry the two.
The shrine was not mentioned in the paragraph you’re referencing.
I apologize. It should have been obvious by indentation that I was including the post you were replying to. I’ve gone back and edited to make that more clear.
To simplify your post, from my viewpoint:
“Your team complained about X.”
“You, suddenly, have no problem with ‘old X’, but think that ‘new different X’ is bad.”
If you can’t see how those two thoughts are connected, well, there’s no hope for ya.
I have to congratulate the resident troll on having successfully derailed the thread onto an irrelevant sidetrack, and continuing to do so by insisting on repeating untruths.
It’s really time we get back to ignoring irrelevant argumentative trolls.
Fair enough. And to respond to that and that alone. There’s no “suddenly” about it, I fine with it back then and completely unaware of anyone having a problem with it.
It’s not like our shrine was originally closer and then suddenly moved 50% to 100% further away for no absolutely no comprehensible reason.
Removed at the same time. Were you not here for the explosions? People trapped on Outland with no way to get back to Azeroth except help from other players? Why do you think the Shrine and Legion Dalaran both have portals to Orgrimmar/Stormwind despite the corresponding portals not leading to that location?
How do you expect the portal removal to improve the game or lure more people to play? Your expectations, not requiring insider information.
The new area of the Orgrimmar portal room IS beyond one of those rooms with the peons. On the PTR, the room towards Orgrimmar now has a stairwell leading to a new portal chamber. It’s ultimately better than just adding a portal in one of those tiny side rooms because there’s now room for more portals.
The room endcap where the CoT portal is in Stormwind is a totally different model than the one used on live. On live, that endcap has shelves, while on PTR, the endcap is identical to the ones that have portals.
That means the main room of the Stormwind portal room is made from modular parts. The stairwells that currently serve as decorative elements to the room are closed off by doors that seem to resemble the ones in the Paladin class hall, and are probably not attached to the room meshes.
They may or may not return the rest of the portals, but they could potentially add more due to the modular nature of the portal rooms.
As it stands, they should add more portals to make travel more efficient, and there’s no real reason not to unless there is a large amount of pressure from higher ups regarding increasing time played metrics (which is a distinct possibility). I’m sure there are better ways to achieve favorable time played metrics than gutting world travel, though, so there is no reason for not making the portal rooms better.