You don’t have a valid argument which is the whole point here. You are just trolling for the sake of trolling.
Naw iv been around long enough to know all the little things you guys do, if i didnt have a valid argument you wouldn’t respond at all. Ty for validating my argument by attacking my avatar instead of disputing the truth.
Don’t be too hard on him. WoW is apparently all he has. Some peoples’ entire identity and self-worth are caught up in a video game.
3 Likes
Dang thats pretty toxic, glad theres no RDF around so i can avoid toxic players like yourself.
Level 13 tho
2 Likes
Thanks it took me 15+ years to get here but the view from the top is great!
Top of my kneecap
1 Like
Can you please provide the reliable source you obtained this information from?
Are you flirting with me?
Honestly, yes
1 Like
Of course!
ironforge.pro/population/classic/overall/
I’m not sure if that’s reliable, but that does seem to be tending down from it’s peak.
If you compare Wrath to TBC and Vanilla it looks much higher. Looks like Wrath nearly doubled the playerbase.
According to that chart that is correct. I believe that WotLK classic had more players than the other classic games.
Yea it grew for ICC not for RDF.
Subs went down sharply after wrath was done.
1 Like
Of course there are trend lines, where the number of raiders dip a little as content gets stale, yet overall we’re at almost double what we were for WoW Classic/TBC Classic.
And not because of RDF. If that were such a game killer the subs wouldn’t have continued to increase after it was implemented.
If a game grows after something is added, that something could hardly have killed the game.
6 Likes
And that probably had little to do with RDF.
1 Like
You think facts mean anything to trolls?
2 Likes
IDK rdf was still there…wrath wasnt. Seems RDF didnt hold subs and held no purpose if its because wrath ended.