RDF a fair compromise

Alright hopefully this puts this to bed

I wasn’t surprised at all, it’s fine in fact.

I took issue when you claimed i was being argumentative when i infact had not even directed anything at you specifically.

you took issue over something i said that isn’t even the stance you hold and then claimed i was being argumentative.

No i’m not at all being argumentative i’m sharing my experience with people who are firmly and unwavering on their no rdf stance, not someone who is ok with it with some compromise.

I took issue as I presumed you were implying that I was Anti RDF and therefore directing the other criticisms toward me.

All good, I think anyone who is firmly unwilling to see how this issue affects both sides and is unwilling to accept any compromise is being selfish and doesn’t want to best system for the majority, which has to be a compromise.

I agree, because at the end of the day regardless of what excuses people want to make and argue that “there is no official data”

The truth is unless you’re being dishonest with yourself, not having RDF hurts more players than having it does, it adds an unecessary barrier of entry to content that should be highly accecssible to everyone!

Your compromise is ignorant… /thread.

Your lack of compromise is ignorant.

LOL like we telling our City council we need cross-walks at this intersection… and they are like no… we’re like its gonna help people walk to where they need to go faster. NO…

And then you come along and are like, ok so like lets do the cross-walk but itll activate every 30 minutes…

Uh… No thanks that wouldn’t save anyone any time.

WHAT YOU DONT WANT THE COMPROMISE DUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRR

Lol what kind of crap analogy is that? Imagine being a RDF purist and associating yourself with this smooth brain. This is how you all look.

Honestly you do more for the anti cross server RDF cause than I ever could.

1 Like

at the expense of every1 else

The analogy is exactly what your compromise sounds like… IGNORANT… the whole thing IGNORANT from the issue to the compromise… rDf iS bAd!!! just CAUSE!!! lol so dumb.

Are you 12 or something?

yeah he likes throwing temper tantrums.

1 Like

How is having RDF with the ability to find groups with players from your server more often then not at the expense of everyone?

I dont even agree with you on this, but i like the fact that youre thinking about what you would do to compromise. Its almost like we have a better shot at fixing this for alts and people who need accessibility if we all just talk about our hangups with the system and what would be acceptable

That was the idea of this thread, for people to give feedback to the idea I put forward and for others to add to or give alternative ideas. Toggle and a popup are 2 great contributions. Then the spam trolls came in a derailed it.

1 Like

RDF Realm Locked doesn’t “produce” more tanks, it doesn’t make the process of finding a dungeon group quicker… RDF Cross-Realm is fine by itself… 0 reason to compromise… Same arguments for having CR RDF are the same ones for CR BG’s… if you don’t understand, think about BG’s but not cross realm… thats what you are suggesting.

Unfortunately this is the forums. Most good ideas arent allowed here.

Question, what if we had rdf for everything except heroics, and heroics we had a cross realm group finder?

I think so long as you still get a daily lockout on each heroic RDF should be right to include for that. My main gripe is not being able to get groups with players that exist in your game world (realm).

1 Like

It literally would be a negligible queue difference. Cross server doesn’t magically create tanks and healers.

Do I have to explain how populations for servers work? and how class disparity from server to server works?

As the guy who came up with this IGNORANT idea, you sure didn’t put a lot of thought into it.

Again, Why have cross realm BG’s? Use your head kiddo.