It’s not about appeasing you. It’s about keeping the classic mmo experience for those that do appreciate it.
No, wrath dungeons were designed independently before RDF was implemented, apart from potentially the dungeons it released with.
RDF wasn’t out at release because they had issues implementing it, not because they planned to roll it out later. Like guild banks in TBC, it was a technical issue.
He’s not smart enough to understand… literally on here just to argue like the rest of them. So unhappy with their life they go to where people are unhappy to try and make them angry… 101 psycho
This tracks, the anti rdf crew have a very hard time with history.
next they will tell you it came out in 3.3.5 despite being wrong about that also.
it’s almost as if most anti rdfers never actually played wrath when it was originally out and don’t understand how integral it was when it did release, they just keep spewing the same old rhetoric that wasn’t true then and isnt true now that they saw on the internet about why it’s bad, from a handful of salty af players who got mad they couldn’t gatekeep dungeons anymore.
Lol personal insults. Maybe you should look in the mirror.
1 Like
It was released in 3.3.0, the last major content patch of WotLK.
If you RDF purists weren’t so blind you’d realise I’m advocating for some form of RDF implementation with an ability to prioritize same server groups first.
1 Like
excuse me?
1 Like
So are we LOL
1 Like
Ok so on another thread you’re for compromise, that’s great. Then you come here without throwing support behind the idea of compromise, you jump on the attack even though this thread is about having RDF and those I’m arguing with are purists that are completely against having a realm only priority system.
If you read the OP you’d see I largely don’t care about any other feature in the RDF other than not being able to get groups with those from your server.
That’s great, contribute to a meaningful discussion. My last few posts were directed at Bolognapony-grobbulus whom is firmly against any form of RDF that isn’t the way they want it.
They have a habit of coming to constructive threads and derailing it with abuse and personal attacks.
incorrect
stop trying to misrepresent me
Edit - pointing out that anti rdf people like to present alternate history does not mean what you’re trying to conflate it to.
That is actually incorrect, it never had a server prio system.
So why then come out with this comment that I replied to? Just in an argumentive mood or something?
literally didn’t even reply to you
Do you have a source of this information? Regardless dungeons were tuned to the state of their release, not to a potential feature that was currently in works that might release before the next xpac.
You replied in support of this which was a reply to a post of mine. So yes you did.
again… didn’t mention you, didnt reply to anything you said made a general comment about people who are staunchly anti rdf.
you chose to take it personally and get offended. I dunno what to say about that.
Supporting a reply to a comment I made is directly getting involved with a reply to me.
If someone says something arugmentive to someone then you infer your support to that statement, you are getting involved, there isn’t a world where this isn’t true.
You are free to take it however you want.
But when i’m flat out telling you that it wasn’t directed at or about you and you want to continue arguing semantics what am i supposed to say.
If i took issue with anything you personally said i would have addressed that to you directly, thats a whole lot of assumptions you just typed out.
You are literally living in this world, because i didn’t even read what you wrote… i saw his comment and made a statement about anti rdf people, i didn’t know your stance, i didn’t know what you said, i didn’t care.
I wasn’t making a point against you.
Ok fair enough, when throwing support behind a reply don’t be surprised when you are then responded to by the person that reply was directed at.
Larry: Bob you’re lazy.
Tom: Yeah builders tend to be lazy.
Bob: Stuff you Larry & Tom.
Tom: What did I do? I wasn’t talking to you I was just saying generally.