Prot vs Spell Damage?

It’s not pointless though.

I don’t either he made a false claim that Prot Pal is weak against magic dmg. I corrected him. Since Prot Pal thrives in an almost pure magic dmg environment. Which is why they have high representation. Which is why I play them to compete. You really like to complicate really simple things.

I wish you luck this conversation wasn’t hard to understand. Now it’s time for an awesome lunch. Hopefully people got the correct information that I provided which is a positive so my time wasn’t wasted. Prot Pal has unbelievable magic mitigation. Good day :wink:

1 Like

This environment does not exist in mythic +. OP was asking about mythic +.

Have a good lunch. :slight_smile:

1 Like

He didn’t, he said

Like come-on, I know you struggle with conversational skills but all you had to do was scroll up.

3 Likes

I debunked all those things if you just scroll up.

1 Like

No, you wrote that PvP damage intake was the same as PvE damage intake for a couple paragraphs and the changed your stance.

2 Likes

One thing that annoys me straight up about this is the thing that constantly happens. Caster mob casts, 50% way through the cast I put up Spell Reflect and some dude interrupts the spell. SR wasted. Happens constantly in 5 mans.

Not reliable at all. Portraying it as a 25 second thing is just not realistic.

1 Like

Thread: Tanks in PvE

Abomb: Prot pally is really good vs casters in PvP

Thread: We are talking about PvE

Abomb: clearly you didn’t read the OP! There is more than just PvE!!!

Thread:

2 Likes

Interruptible damage should be interrupted.

1 Like

It is, Interrupt trackers are a thing, discord is also a thing for higher keys or keys with friends.

Yea D stance would fix that and if Spell reflect was 10 sec CD again. It would feel really good then. Kinda interested at what David Kim will be doing with design and changes moving forward. Lets hope he works on the lost design of Prot War. Just being hopeful that I can play my old warrior again some day.

1 Like

God, move on from the fixation.

Spell reflect has been in the game over 13 years. It was only a 10s cd for four of those.

Tanks. Are. Intended. To be weak. To magic.

Demanding changes that specifically goes against that is about as effective as trying to break a brick wall with your head. Although, I imagine you’d give that a go as well.

Play classic.

Sorry would love real Prot warrior class design again. Stop telling people what they should and should not enjoy.

You win most ridiculous sentence of the day. Gratz.

Can’t wait for TBC it will be really fun.

1 Like

Every prot warrior design is real.

I did not do this.

Simply a statement a fact. I highly doubt that qualifies as ridiculous in any real sense of the term.

That is not true any class at any time get lose it’s direction on class design and move away from their core identity.

Again when Prot warriors starts to feel like Prot warriors again I will dust off my main. Until then have to wait for TBC because the class design for Prot warrior has gone in the total wrong direction.

You do though.

Make believe facts are not facts.

1 Like

One thing that did legitimately make me ree was when I looked at the Prot pala abilities. They have a 15 second melee interrupt plus they have a ranged chain lightning with a 3 second silence.

Where is my Gag order. Where is my !@#$ing Gag order, Blizz?

1 Like

Identity changing does not remove you from being “real”. Things change. That is not a bad thing inherently.

The result of such a change can be perceived as a net-negative, but that’s an individual opinion. A subjective take. Not a fact. And the reverse is also true.

Then quote it.

…are you insane.

Spell reflection was added in 2007. It’s CD was changed from 10s to 25s in 2011.

Basic bloody math.

Your statement remains ridiculous and laughable because you aren’t making a point.

Scroll up or use any other post you chime in on with your ADS (Abomb Derangement Syndrome) The healing begins when you admit you have a problem :smiling_face_with_three_hearts:

Sure it does just like Deep wounds and Arms being a bleed build was massively hated because it wasn’t a real Warrior build. That is why players rejoiced when it changed.

Again it’s easy to get away from real class design. If you disagree coolizies…

They fixed Arms class design some in SL now they just got to work on Prot warrior.

1 Like

I thought it was because the statement was false and ridiculous.

At least pretend to stay consistent.

Quote it or admit you’re wrong. You made the claim, provide the evidence.

The new mastery has had massive backlash. (And it’s still deep wounds)

Arms, prior to BFA, has had bleeds be the majority of it’s damage seven times in the past. This was far from the first time.

If your entire reasoning is to use BFA as an example of moving away from the core, then you’re simply incorrect. This was not a first-time thing.

hahahahahha.

God, people like you are incredible. You talk to what, the only three people that don’t laugh in your face, and base your entire viewpoints on that.

Some more casual-esque people enjoy the arms changes.

Some despise them.

Those on the higher-end almost universally hate the changes. Those in the middle, as always, have as many opinions as they do characters. Too many.

Arms has not had a true “core” design in over a decade. Every single expansion, it receives changes because of player backlash over the design, and a demand for change. From players like you, actually.

Perhaps Blizzard should stop listening to players like you.

They shouldn’t listen to level 11 trolls that is for sure. :rofl:

Again I hope that maybe they can hire some Devs with vision on returning warriors to the iconic spec they were. I am hopeful for the future. I would love to play my old main again.

1 Like

Muh damage ignores armor and requires less work, woe is me, it’s not a real build

My dot is ticking while he runs around a pillar and puts me in a root oh noooo but I’m not clicking noooooo