Policy Update for Input Broadcasting Software

Yeah, but you can still launch the clients without the battle net launcher.

Have you considered the possibility that Blizzard has decided that fairness in their games is finally more important then money?

Or do you think I am being naive?

This is great! Finally we’re going to get rid of the botters/gold farmers in classic! Except the software used to bott is completely different and already bannable and detectable by you guys…so this isn’t really going to affect them just piss off players who have been using this stuff for years and you have refused to make a clear statement on…yet players can easily spot botts and gold farmers because we, you know, actually play the game. There not hard to spot, usually a hunter or mage with jumble of letters for a name and a pet with a Chinese name (as well as the items they link in chat being Chinese). Online 24 hrs a day, only logging for 30 min every 8 hours for I assume bott runner rotation, (reporting for account sharing seems to have a quicker response than botting) in the same area or running the same dungeon all day long. The gold farmers on Pagle won’t even deny it when asked and they act almost proud of the fact they are getting away with it. So whats the plan for next quarter when the numbers don’t change lock the game to only running one game instance like SWTOR does?

3 Likes

Yes, you are correct. There are two groups of people in play here:

  1. Multiboxers, the set of all players using software to coordinate multiple accounts, so one person can play several characters at the same time while still following the “one keystroke per action” rule
  2. Cheaters, the subset of multiboxers who use multiboxing software as part of a botting suite, to automate gameplay, usually to farm resources

Blizzard fired this shot at the second group, and obliterated them both.

8 Likes

As well you should - reporting automation is good. But- YOU are the one doing the policing in that context.

You do realize that you can use a KVM? To get around it.

It’s a hardware not a software solution.

It boils down to a emotional response I feel like.

I only report people when they call me a racial slur but I still see them in game so eh.

Love that I’ve been calling this approach for a while (The Keystroke mirroring ban) since you know - I can’t bind 4 OCD’s to one macro without it “ruining the game experience”, and got mobbed for it every time.

Feels like sweet revenge. Anyways, at least you’re gonna be saving a couple hundred bucks a month.

1 Like

Really eager for a forum vacation I see.

1 Like

Wouldn’t it be more like you’re responsible for one characters movements and the software you’re using is responsible for the rest of them

If I open up 2 WoW clients right now on 2 accounts and hold W on 1 only one of my toons will more

2 Likes

This is the Todd Howard approach he used in Fallout 76…didn’t end well there either

2 Likes

https://imgur.com/boe1RYa

1 Like

That post was just to that particular person about math, nothing more.

Anyway, I think you are, sort of. There are many ways that multiboxers are playing without using this software. Blizzard is being lazy, not treating the root of a problem.

1 Like

To me it’s not fair, and this is my reason why;

Because the adventure is meant to be about you, in an individual character going out into the world and making your contribution to fighting the enemies of Azeroth, that’s the story and that’s the adventure.

In real life you don’t get to clone yourself and make double money, so you shouldn’t in wow.

Simply put, multiboxing wrecks the fantasy and immersion of the game, therefore is not fair.

It is a crime against fantasy.

2 Likes

Finally a good change to see, i’ve been getting tired of hearing people defend using a third party software to achieve an advantage.

When playing WoW it should have always been a 1:1 with input, you click 1, only one character does an action.

3 Likes

Not as big as you might think though, My money is this is also because this is a simpler solution than having to try put localization restrictions on Argentinian accounts. which most multiboxers probably use for cheaper subs.

To be blunt. I constantly begged in GD for something akin to personal resource nodes, which would have broken multibotting’s advantage in resource gathering. Every single time, a swarm of multibot apologists would attack the idea, because their single driving purpose was to maintain the absolutely unfair advantage that multibotting provided.

I’m glad it’s gone, and I hope Blizzard sticks to their guns on this. Shadowlands could be a total dumpster fire at this point, and it’s the best expansion EVER, because it looks like multibotting and run of the mill botting might actuall get addressed. My favorite part of the game is the economy side of it, and that’s hard to enjoy when material prices are being dropped below the point a non-multibot could be bothered to gather.

7 Likes

Nah, I’m just the bloke who proverbially called 911 before the cops shoot their dog.

Yeah, where are all of the white knights now? All of the people who spammed “BuT It’S NoT aGaInSt ThE ToS”?

Sweet revenge does feel good.

1 Like