Yes i could .
It would give them the Conan the Barbarian look .
A Drakthyr in lizard form coveys Paladin better then that bag of Skittles you threw up on yourself
So in other words do away with transmogging and everyone goes back to looking like a clown on a bad acid trip .
You always could, thereâs nothing stopping you from mix and matching set pieces with other gear your class can equip.
Youâre not being force fed anything with the amount of transmog options you have, itâs even comical ppl feel like they are.
Fabulous fabulous, butterfly stabbulous.
Almost my entire mog is made of pieces that can be worn by any class.
Walking around in robes, as a caster, is not fun. Being forced to it, is not fun. I need to play alts to get different good variations, and if I have a theme I want to go, I often cant with just class fantasy parts.
Its incredibly restrictive.
Thats why these outfits they have been giving that everyone can use is wonderful.
Too late
Sure he wonât mistake you for his wife ?
You know the age old question about Belf males . Similar to the question about dwarven females.
Youâre talking person who also a clothie, some of the sets I have also use robes but I replace those with non robe pieces while keeping everything else intact.
Sounds to me you donât want to be creative.
Muh lore in shambles over how hot this paladin is.
lmao.
ok but I want to be a battlemage wearing plate armour, so how about those apples?
and then I looked at your mog and realized the satire of your post.
2 Likes
Yes, I can see that.
And your character screams âIm a priest.â
I want my character to scream âIm part of the Explorers Leagueâ.
Thats what I mean by that.
Sometimes, I want to make Mogs to look like a cultist. Sometimes, I want to make mogs to look like a Pirate or a Thief.
Having the freedom to do so regardless of the class you make, is not a bad thing.
I think weâve been Rick rolled lol
1 Like
I disagree but you do you hon.
Blizzard throws in cosmetics every now and then thatâs available to all classes. We just had a pirate theme one last month btw.
We can agree to disagree! But the concept of Clerics in fantasy game wearing heavy armors, as example, or Battlemages in full plate, or Warriors in leathers like true barbarians, or a nature fighter that dress with animals fur but is a rage filled warrior are concepts as old as time, and being limited to: âClothies wear robes. Plates only wear buckets.â Is a restriction that cripples creativity.
I have been collecting the cosmetics, they are great! Although I sure would love to wear the bear head and gloves from Legion Druid on a Warrior. Sadly, I cant.
1 Like
Feel like this is a bit disingenuous
Barbarian is its own class compared to Warrior. For Battlemage to make sense they would need to be actual melee units and not range. Cleric is basically Priest in armor instead of cloth so youâre trading one restriction in for another which goes against your point.
In retrospect, itâs comical how long it took WoW to get past that and the âstandard shapesâ for gear (outside of shoulders & helms).
Even now, gear is 50%+ latex bodypaint.
At least itâs no longer 99%.
2 Likes
pointless in retail they can just fly away and unwarmode off. back to classic with u if u want to troll in pvp
Barbarian is Fury Warrior.
But what you pointed out are semantics, I just want my character to look like that, not necessarily play like that.
But tbh, I crave a melee caster for Warlock so badâŚ
As for the Cleric bit? The goal is just being able to have the option. Maybe you want to dress in plate. Maybe you want to dress in a robe.
Whatever suits you.
Right? It was genuine upsetting.
They really need to bring that to 0%, just leave that to the old mogs.
If you say so
I still remember in PvP long ago that Fury Warriors had a passive that, unless dispelled, they could remain with 1 HP and continue fighting.
They are the WoW version of Barbarian, every game has a version of it, even if its not 100% faithful to the base concept, because that way it fits the universe better.