Yep. No one will care about 9/9 normal. Some will care about 9/9 heroic. Its a requirement for many. Now the chest beating begins at say 3/9 mythic.
You just can’t tell how rng will work. I spent weeks/months doing the fishing daily and got nothing. Then I got the bone fishing pole on two characters the same day and the fishing cap on a third alt. All on the same day, the same hour even. Now I’m back to getting nothing on 8 alts almost every day for the past few weeks.
My dk I have on grobb got that fishing pole day 1. Straight out of DK intro to org…and voila, bone fishing pole.
All I could say was wtf and laugh. i had a main do that 100 times…not a damn thing.
But, but, but they’re not having fun the RIGHT way!!
You do realize that you can only do 1 difficulty either Normal or heroic you can’t run both in the same week.
Im not against adding LFR in MOP just in Cata. Simply because it serves no purpose. If blizz doesnt add H+ dungeons then sure add LFR but if they are going to add a catch up mechcanic where players can get heroic gear without doing heroic raid content which gives higher ilvl then LFR why add LFR?
well at the time it was the start of cross-realm groups. Which might have been useful but a few abused it by afk looting
Dont forget about the guilds who would que up with 24 people and then NEED roll on all the loot just to give it to their main roster.
shortly after there was personal loot was default in lfr
Shortly after? Personal loot was not added to LFR until SoO.
Dragon soul LFR was released November 29 2011
MoP was released September 25 2012
SoO was released September 10 2013
That is almost a 2 year gap between last i checked 2 years is not a short period of time.
I suspect LFR is coming so get ready for it and to be honest - what is the big deal anyway. I use it in retail to gear alts, learn fights, or complete quests. My main does not use LFR at all…nothing in there for him.
IT isnt coming buddy, LFR is not needed.
The fact that we have Inferno dungeons that allow people to buy heroic gear from raids. So with that being said inferno 2.0 will allow players to buy 391 loot and 397 rag loot so LFR is not needed.
LFR Dragon soul drops 384 and 390 loot see why it is not needed?
Fire Mage (S-Tier)
Arms Warrior (S-Tier)
Balance Druid (S-Tier)
Elemental Shaman (S-Tier)
Survival Hunter (A-Tier)
Unholy Death Knight (A-Tier)
Assassination Rogue (A-Tier)
Frost Death Knight (A-Tier)
Combat Rogue (A-Tier)
Shadow Priest (A-Tier)
Demonology Warlock (A-Tier)
Affliction Warlock (B-Tier)
Subtlety Rogue (B-Tier)
Retribution Paladin (B-Tier)
Enhancement Shaman (B-Tier)
Feral Druid (C-Tier)
Destruction Warlock (C-Tier)
Fury Warrior (C-Tier)
Beast Mastery Hunter (C-Tier)
Arcane Mage (C-Tier)
Marksmanship Hunter (D-Tier)
Frost Mage (D-Tier)
Cope harder non-potato boy
going off of speculations and not hard evidince i see keep following the streamers there buddy. Feral is ranked #19 out 22 which makes it F tier!!!
F-tier means not viable, NON-POTATO BOY. Cope harder.
F tier is a letter grade 19 out 22 = 18.18% that is a F
And I already explained that context matters when ranking a class, feral is bad on like 3 fights this tier due to fight design, including Rag where they have an entire phase that they cannot attack his back.
You cannot just glance at WCL stats and make blanket statements.
There’s not a single reasonable buff you could give feral that fixes fight design.
16 out of 22 buddy, not 19. COPIUM IS REAL
lol using only the top 5% of data vs using 100% of the data is called selective and does not give you a real comparison which also lacks representation and unrealistic expectations/ While using 100% of the data provides a more comprehensive and accurate analysis of class performance.
relying solely on the top 5% of parses can lead to a skewed and incomplete understanding of class rankings and damage, whereas using 100% of the data offers a more balanced and realistic view
If you read the posts from the 2 or 3 elitists against it, you know what the big deal is: it’s about ego. A very fragile ego wrapped up in a video game.
Okay well on overall feral is 16 of 22.
And using the bottom 50% of parses means including people who aren’t playing the class correctly. Realistically even up to the 80th-90th percentiles people don’t play correctly. It’s not until 99-100 that you’re actually dealing with rng/kill time as the primary difference in performance.
And, since I’m having to repeat myself with you, warriors have been expected to perform at the 95th+ percentile for any comparison to be made. I will happily hold every other class to the same standards.