I directly refuted your “one appearance” argument. That was pretty obvious was it not? We don’t need more people falsely stating that MT only locked one appearance per spec. If you’re taking it personally then that’s on you.
This was removed?
The original ram from 2007, I think, was removed.
For no damn reason or warning.
Shoot, I’m doubtful I have that one. I have a brewfest ram but I’m dubious it’s the brewfest ram.
It’s not false, each spec has 6 unique appearances with 4 color tints each.
You’re arguing semantics because when someone like me explains how many appearances were removed versus how many they didn’t remove it makes the mage tower argument look ridiculous and you clearly don’t want that.
6 Likes
A different tint=different appearance.
Why do you think the game says “You haven’t collected this appearance” when you’re missing a recolor?
There’s no semantics involved here, there’s 4 appearances locked behind MT tower completion per spec. Plain and simple. Why are you getting so upset over this?
1 Like
What other skin was locked behind the Mage Tower? Recolors are not separate skins.
3 Likes
Read what I wrote. Did I say “skin” (which I guess means “model” to you)?
Again who cares? Maybe I’ll use percentages next time so you won’t get so bent out of shape.
You also keep suggesting I’m upset when I haven’t said anything to indicate that lmao. This is getting sad but I can’t say I’m surprised.
2 Likes
So you don’t like others knowing the correct information then? Got it.
It’s ok to be wrong, but the way you react to being corrected speaks to your character.
About the response that I expected. I’ll use percentages next time another pointless thread like this comes up so you don’t get all confused.
4 Likes
I did. Appearance=Skin=Model. Recolors are separate things.
3 Likes
No, appearance != model, unless you’re saying the game is wrong by
- Listing all appearances (e.g. recolors) under the “Appearances” tab
- Stating in the tooltip “You haven’t collected this appearance” for recolors
Sorry if I’m using Blizzard’s definition and not yours.
1 Like
People obsess over the mage tower more than anything else in the entire game.
They act like the mage tower is the most important end game instance ever created in any game ever.
1 Like
It is now that it’s a great money maker 
I go by what players would say.
No matter the color of Bro Bear someone picks to run a player seeing it would see it as a Mage Tower appearance.
In the end these semantics are par for the course for your GD posts.
2 Likes
It’d be cool if they had a ‘Mage Tower’ of sorts for each Timewalking expansion, with unique expansion themed weapon / form models in correlation to the class/spec and a expansion themed mount for completing each sect.
There is no use arguing with someone like that lol. They’ll continue to argue the definition of the word “appearance” so they don’t have to address the fact that the vast majority of legion appearances are still available to players.
3 Likes
Ah. It was unarmored and one of the slow mounts. (60% speed)
That was before the big change where all the mounts are based on your riding skill.
I see now. Too bad it was removed.