Player Housing Can Save World of Warcraft

This will not be one of those pro-housing posts that claims, “because everyone wants it, ‘blizz’ should do it.” Ion Hazzikostas once lamented in an interview that players who use general terms to describe their personal wants like, “we all want” and “everybody wants,” were not helpful forms of feedback, so this is my personal experiential take on how I think player housing can begin to save World of Warcraft(WoW). This post will be organized into several lengthy sections outlined below.

  1. The Philosophy
  2. Alternative Content
  3. Professions and Economy
  4. Summary

First, what do I mean by “save,” here? I mean that player housing could remedy bad design philosophy and revitalize core features of the game to the benefit of all.

(Edit) Perhaps it needs to be said, this post is not a wish list for how to do player housing- it is an argument for why to do player housing.

1. The Philosophy (Edit: Originally section #4 but moved to #1 so as not to be missed)

1.a. This is where player-housing helps course-correct bad design philosophy. The detached and elitist bad design philosophy of WoW that says “Player housing? Garrisons. Open world content? World Quests. High-seas exploration? Instanced Island Expeditions. Interctive armor? Azerite. Rogue-like experience? Torghast.” Enough is enough, is enough, is enough. I say no to all of these, and everything in between.

1.b. The implementation of player housing could transform design philosophy in WoW because it would be a major self-correction after years of neglect and elitist developing. It would say, “We want to offer something more, something meaningful. We want to modernize our game and bring the RPG back into MMORPG. We want to see what our players are capable of, see our assets used in endlessly creative ways, and maybe learn something along the way. We want to not only be a better game, but the best game.”
Imagine seeing that letter on a blue post.

2. Alternative Content

2.a. What is there to do in WoW? The chief modes of engagement are (for PVE) dungeons and raiding and (for PVP) arenas and battlegrounds. You do mythic pluses, raid, or you queue for PVP. This is where bad design philosophy affects the longevity of WoW. There is a profound lack of meaningful and even meaningless alternative content. There are too few options, and transmog and battle pets simply aren’t enough. By not enough, they aren’t expressive or fulfilling enough. You can only wear and see one transmog set at a time. You can only ride one mount at a time while staring at your collection alone. You can only collect so many battlepets to then realize there is no function or feature beyond. But imagine if there was a way you could express the totality of yourself and your WoW experience how you see fit, your own changeable, sharable pocket of WoW that holistically embodies all of these features and more.

2.b. If you don’t want to raid for an entire patch, or do dungeons every week, and if collecting a transmog sets doesn’t fill that gameplay void, then what is there? WoW is missing many features of modern MMO’s from puzzles(Gw2), treasure hunting(Rift), interactive open-world content(ESO, FF), and, most strikingly, player housing(all of the above + SWTOR & Runescape). You might say, why cite “less popular” games’ features as the missing link for WoW’s success? Simply, I say, the extent to which these games do thrive is directly related to some or all of these modes. Gw2 is known colloquially as “fashion wars.” Rift has an incredibly comprehensive grassroots player housing community. ESO and FF have noteworthy open world content. SWTOR and the rest all have player housing while Runescape additionally has a thriving community-based giveaways experience. Some of these games might be missing the consistent and impactful dungeon and raid content that WoW produces, hindering their longevity, while WoW misses every mode of alternative content that other MMO’s offer, hindering its longevity. Imagine a coupling of the two. Imagine a WoW that maintains quality PVE content, and offers alternative modern modes of engagement in between and in addition.

2.c. So how does player housing fill the void of alternative content in WoW? Similarly to transmog, but perhaps more effectively, it restores meaning and purpose to every piece and place of WoW. Housing items obtainable behind old raids, dungeons, new and old quests, PVP, professions (it’s own category later), exploration, pet battles, achievements, open-world interactions, and anything else you can think of- the endless hunt for items for one’s next great build is, quite literally, endless. Therefore, it gives content in WoW additional permanence. Old (and current) raids will always have something to offer, besides that one set or mount you really wanted and then never see that raid again. Dungeons will always have something to offer. There will always be productive engagement with open-world content that involves one’s housing enterprise. Furthermore, it allows players and developers alike to revisit and reuse all of the beautiful assets of the game’s past that are just sitting in empty zones or instances. Recollect the majesty of Suramar City, and now think of how it is empty, useless, and offers us nothing but a way to get into Nighthold for transmog or mounts. Now, imagine a player-house in Suramar City, or a player-house elsewhere that uses assets from Suramar City to create something entirely new. I once read a poem that suggested the best way to honor something isn’t to let it collect dust on a shelf to periodically oogle or disregard, but to use it, and I agree. One of the best ways to honor the hard work of developers past and the beautiful architecture of WoW is to use it. Maintain it, allow players the creative freedom to show what they and this game are capable of expressing, and honor all the hard work that went into building this world.

2.d. When one thinks player housing, I encourage you to think and examine Rift’s dimension system, which in my view is the single most comprehensive and endless housing system in any MMO. And that is the key here, the endless nature of this type of content- that it keeps going, that it self-produces, that it provides purpose, meaning, satisfies creative impulses, and allows you to both play and revitalize the game you love and honor your own sense of self that hitherto can only be expressed through transmog or mounts. Player housing is alternative content that never ends, inspires communities and competitions, and offers a modern engagement experience. It is the beginning of the alternative content solution.

3. Professions and Economy

3.a. Player housing will solve the age-old conundrum of “how do we make professions relevant?” One of the key problems with any adjustment to professions in WoW to make them relevant in a given patch or expansion is that the use of these adjustments are always temporary. A profession and its expansion-specific features are always limited-time-use, and even then their value is not guaranteed to last the expansion (see shadowlands Relics) or to even exist. So every single patch and expansion we revisit the same self-made problem over and over: “what do we do with professions this time.” And every patch and expansion, it’s a self-defeating let down. In every game with player-housing I have experienced, player housing has single-handedly revitalized entire professions and stimulated the base economy.

3.b. Player-housing items have the opportunity to offer every single profession something to farm materials for, to craft, and to use or sell. This conversely offers interested buyers something to always buy from professions. Player housing makes professions permanent. We would no longer have to sit around twiddling our thumbs trying to conjure up ruinous ways to manipulate professions every expansion, because player-housing would always be there. These items would always be in demand, and always be expanding as the game’s assets and architecture expands. Every profession can finally have a home- your home- your guild’s home- your friend’s home.

3.c. The advent of player-housing would then pump gold directly into the WoW economy and siphon much of the excess and inflated gold floating around inventories all around. And, when I said player-housing would benefit all, I meant all, including ActiBlizzard. Players spend real money on housing in every MMO. In WoW, they would buy wow-tokens for gold for desirable items that would go straight to crafters, to professionss, and potential desirable housing items from the in-game shop for would-be builders to salivate over. ActiBlizzard wins. You make the company money, you provide endless alternative content for players- real endless content, not Torghast endless content. Everybody wins. In the current state of affairs you expect people to pay large sums without offering them much in return. I say, player-housing is the first step to reconciling the economically abusive, content-lacking, relationship between ActiBlizzard and its players.

4. Summary
Player-housing has the potential to revitalize and course-correct World of Warcraft, its player experience, and its player-developer relationship in ways perhaps never achieved before. We sit before an opportunity to rejuvenate entire economies, professions, and social engagement, and truly bring WoW to the roster of modern MMOs. The alternative- leaving WoW in the dustbin of self-assured hasbeens sitting on laurels from ages past. We have a chance to repair relationships, produce something meaningful, and make the overlords money while doing it. There is a World of Warcraft where everybody wins, where everybody can find some meaning, and where everybody can find their home.

-Texasdktoast

131 Likes

Housing saved professions on many mmorpgs. It’s also a major gold sink.

What I found cool in many other mmos is the ability to flex with your house. Decorating your home with trophies and items that come from achievements or feats of strength feels very good.

54 Likes

I’m not against player housing…

But I don’t think it will be as effective as you claim.

61 Likes

I don’t see the devs admitting defeat by letting us go back to Azeroth.

Just doesn’t work that way.

6 Likes

It’s hard to say. I can name a few people who have done some Real “Something that isn’t money” Trading just to get plots in FF14.

It’s definitely a system we can point to in WoW’s competitors that has a lot of engagement.

1 Like

you got my hopes up then immediately smashed them to pieces.

I don’t see blizz adding housing
or if they do, I don’t see them adding it well

case in point: garrisons

19 Likes

I have negative interest in Player Housing. Adding it is one of the few things that are an outright dealbreaker for me.

:man_shrugging:

4 Likes

Agreed, if done correctly this could be a way to retain and gain players, especially as the playerbase ages, raids & mythic aren’t going to be as attractive to play.

Housing would give an avenue of progressive play, again if done correctly.

12 Likes

I see a very large system for a limited audience.

All of that gear, items, recipes, currencies, quests, etc. is a parallel universe of single player content.

We actually have this already in a couple of places, just quite small.

First, there’s the Farm. Small patch, try to get the dog.

Then there’s the Garrison, which is as close as we’ve come. If anything was a formal experiment as to the affect and impact of “player housing”, it was the Garrison – and clearly Blizzard wasn’t content with the result.

We also have Archaeology in Legion. There’s a little shop to hang the trophies you get through that.

Pretty empty, that little shop.

The premise seems to be that for Player Housing to work, it has to be bigger. More options, more locations, more furniture, recipes, equipment. Because housing advocates are full of criticisms of the Garrison.

And, frankly, I don’t think it can justify being bigger in order to isolate more and more players.

To be an MMO, it’s important for the MM part to be out in the world. Its part of why flying comes so late. It’s why the capitol cities were consolidated. Scattering a limited playerbase across the vastness of all the planes and planets of Azeroth is a recipe for cricket invasion.

Arguably, it’s bad enough we have the 4 covenant homes. At least Belarus and Zuldazar were teeming with folks during BfA.

WoW is not Second Life. It’s not a player housing world or game, it’s a theme park MMO where we run around and kill monsters.

17 Likes

How will Player Housing advance the eSport design philosophy of the last 10 years?

That is Blizzard’s overall goal with this game. Make the MMORPG into an eSport… Arenas, Mythic+ and now the support of World First Raids all fit into this philosophy. They are adding ladders for Torghast to support the everything is an eSport ideal. Even the Trial of Style fits the premise.

Figure out how Player Housing becomes an eSport and you’ll get it in the game.

12 Likes

As much as I would love a very well thought out and designed player housing, there are far greater issues that needs to be fixed at the moment.

2 Likes

I can site its efficacy in every mentioned MMO. I’m not interested in conjuring a naive wishlist. I’m looking at what has been done before, what the effects have been, and what it could mean for WoW. I respect your skepticism, though.

You’re stuck in the mindset of bad design philosophy. It’s not an either-or issue. My point is precisely that adjusting their philosophy on development will inspire change in these “far greater issues” you believe in. Furthermore, that all of this can be done simultaneously.

1 Like

On Garrisons, I am as convinced now as I was then that Garrisons were intentionally gimped as Blizzard having their cake and eating it. They got to test out subsystems that they would carry over, while being able to point at it as why housing is a bad idea.

Garrisons are by nearly all definitions not anymore of a player house than the farm is. Given that it is also a military base and… not a house.

11 Likes

Player housing competitions are an integral part of the Rift-dimensioning community for example. What makes it meaningful is that it is player-run and developer-sanctioned. The players build their own communities, competitions, and rewards- and the developers, out of respect for this endeavor, often highlight these events, add to them, and work with them. I don’t know about literal esports. I generally reject the idea- but there is no lack of competitive potential.

2 Likes

I will sacrifice a patch to the housing gods :slight_smile:

15 Likes

You cite the tiny ways blizzard has attempted this before and failed. And with that you make my point exactly. They attempted miniscule, skewered versions of something that is meant to be greater. Those features failed in WoW because of the bad design philosophy I mention over and over. Change the philosophy, and you change the features for the better. On the anti-social point- I make the point specifically that player-housing in MMO’s has exactly nurtured social interaction and community engagements. Rift, ESO, Gw2, SWTOR, all have substantial community and player housing movements, guilds, and engagements. Player housing can course correct the issues you outline precisely

6 Likes

No, I just understand that if your house is burning down around you putting in new drapes really doesn’t help that much. Don’t get me wrong, I would love a solid player housing system added. But that isn’t going to fix some of the core issues that they have been neglecting and are the true problem with the game as the moment.

5 Likes

like the idea. we def need some kind of personal area/house/whatever

4 Likes

Except im not talking about drapes. I say specifically that this is an issue of philosophy. You change the philosophy, you change how core issues are addressed, and ultimately, hopefully, made better.

1 Like