#NOCHANGES 🐒 , Arguments flawed and debunked (SERIOUS)

I don’t hate the idea of at some LONG point add more content to the game, without changing the cap level, the clases or else. You want more BG? add Arenas? New bosses? IMO is ok.

It will be extreme rare that there will be classic server and classic+ server at the same time. And it sucks that people that start playing at that point will no longer get the “true classic experience”

That be said, I’m adamant against add stuff that don’t exist in classic and that will modify the gameplay experience (flying, dual esp, tokens)

I know, thanks for the insightful comment =)

what?

/10char

Ive said this and Ill say it again. The “no changes” people are the same people who play Dust 18 hours a day on Counter Strike. They hold onto a memory and think that having the same old content will keep them happy.

Blizzard never offered a way of playing Classic past TBC either until they did.

They might one day offer Classic +

4 Likes

I would unsub so fast if you forced me to progress that it would make you think it was automated.[quote=“Háppy-bigglesworth, post:347, topic:288617, full:true”]
Sorry that you want to change how the game was created. I rather play the way it was intended.
[/quote]

The way classic is intended is as a museum piece, and an authentic recreation of vanilla wow. Per blizzard.

wow you can tell a lot thought went into this.

amazing, if only someone had warned us about doing the same quests and dungeons over and over.

2 weeks in and people already making posts like this yikery yikers dawg.

Yeah, I can’t believe this idiot Loghain is thinking ahead for the longevity of the game, so stupid. we’re only 2 weeks in, YIKES dawg

That’s your opinion, and you are wrong.

Well played everyone.

Nochanges is going to kill the game if adopted by Blizz. There is already people saying the game is boring. Imagine the sub dropoff 5 years later. Tons of people resubbed ONLY for classic, and they’ll be cancelling that sub if they are bored.

People really think Classic is gonna last forever, but it’s something called nostalgia and not something for everyone to stay all the time.

At some point, Classic+ is gonna have to happen for people to stay or bring new players in because not everyone’s gameplay style is exactly the same as they are back 15 years ago. Convenience is where the game caters to players.

Agreed. Classic can’t last forever as a profitable game. Classic+, however, offer a more hardcore & old school experience while still adding new content to keep people engaged.

1 Like

Some people need to take a look at this thread again according to the front page.

Are you sure that Blizzard won’t change the current servers to Classic + servers? If you can promise me that Naxx will always be the last raid on my server then I’m fine with any additional servers with more content. But I want to get my naxx gear, be satisfied, do the same with an alt or two and then contently unsub from blizz. I want my characters to stay there for as long as the classic servers are live so that I can resub at any time that I want to and see that all of my progress is still there and relevant.
So if Blizzard doesn’t change my current server, then I’m happy. But I won’t trust them not to go back on their word of “as long as there are players willing to play classic, we’ll keep them running” (or something like that). I agree that they’re doing all of this for money, and they aren’t honorable enough to keep Classic servers in their museum state just to keep a promise if they end up losing money on it down the road.

Honestly, if you guys want Classic 2.0 or whatever new content with lvl 60 still as the max, go for it. You should get it. I agree with your points.
But, until I see that Blizzard has made (or at least plans on making) those new servers AND keeping current servers as they are, then I’m going to stay on the side of #nochanges or #noTBC or however you want to call this side.

Subscription based video games aren’t made to cater to people like you, and Classic is not meant as a museum. It’s a product, and if everyone used the mindset that you used the servers would be shutdown fast. (I mean no offense, but it’s true.)

I’m 99% sure. Blizz KNOWS the majority of people right now joined Classic for Vanilla. It’s the entire mission statement for the company: recreate the classic experience. They will keep those servers up for years to come, but only if the profits outweigh the costs, thus they have to innovate and create fresh servers with different or new content (TBC/Wrath/Classic+)

If you’re not wanting to cause offense, I would recommend not trying to isolate the other person with certain phrases such as, “people like you.” Saying “no offense” at the end of an offensive remark doesn’t do much. Of course, I can only be offended if I choose to, so…
With response to what you said: I agree that Classic wasn’t brought back so that Blizzard could sleep well at night knowing that they made some nostalgic players happy again. I know they did it for the money, and sure it’s a product. But I know that “people like me” came back to WoW Classic for what it was. Many of us aren’t looking for another long-term, constantly expanding MMORPG. Even if Classic + maintains the core aspects of Vanilla WoW and doesn’t turn into the entirely different game of Retail WoW, then you should still expect those of us who came back to leave again.
Are subscription based video games “made to cater to people like [me]”? No. Of course not. I want to “beat the game” which would not align with the idea of a sub based game. But you also need to realize that not every one who came back to this subscription based game is a subscription type of player who wants to sub for years and years to come. I intend on maybe getting 2 years out of Classic and move on with my life. I don’t know that I am in the minority or majority, but neither do you. I only know that if they change my classic realms, “people like me” (which I’d bet are a very large number of the current subs) won’t come back when game time runs out.

As a side note: it’s kinda funny that we’re even talking about this before future phases have been released. We don’t actually know for certain that phases 6 will be out in the next year.

[quote=“Loghain-blaumeux, post:1, topic:288617, full:true”]3. Blizzard can’t be trusted, they will screw it up and ruin Classic+. (This is how we got retail!)

The safest assumption is that Classic+ will be its own server separate than the Vanilla museum server, so your vanilla experience isn’t in danger at all. Secondly, it’s reductive to assume you know Blizzard’s intentions or goals in terms of game design. They know the demographics of their Classic community (more hardcore) and will cater new content to the new community, much like any other company. (So no LFG, flying at level 40, heirlooms, etc.) The fact that Blizz acted quickly to disable the LFG addon before launch should clue you in to how they intend to support the vanilla community going forward, so no, Blizz is not going to make “another retail.” That already exists.[/quote]

First, that’s not a safe assumption. In fact, there’s no reason whatsoever to assume they’d do that.

Second, Blizzard has proven, repeatedly, over the last decade or so, that they cannot be trusted at all to provide good updates to existing games, with the only exception to that being Reaper of Souls (and that was helped by D3 being such a massive failure on release). It is not “reductive” to assume that Blizzard is going to continue with the design philosophy they’ve demonstrated for the past decade.

edit: what did they do to the forums’ quote feature?

Pretty sure you’re missing a zero there. Are all of your points this hilariously wrong?

So yes, everything you’re saying is wrong. Blizzard themselves described it as a museum piece during development.

Lol the irony.

You got me, didn’t realize this was satire.