Well blizz thanks for making my mind of for me. Its back to vanilla and tbc full time when the mop prepatch comes. I was interested but not that interested.
On a side note how different is this “NO LFR Crowd” compared to the “Wall of No Crowd” They seem like the same people to me.
Is it really that hard to join a guild in a MMO? If a set schedule is a issue why dont you just join one of those mega guilds with like 10 different runs. Or alternatively join a run thats being advertised on the server discord?
Like idrc about it being removed or added back in, but the main complaint seems to be with the set schedule aspect of guilds. But theres good alternatives to that.
You’re still playing Classic. They don’t care.
Need to unsub to send a message.
vanilla and tbc dont have lfr either
Vanilla and TBC aren’t supposed to have LFR. Mop should.
idc either way, aslong as I can just ignore it and do dungeons for the lfr loot and avoid lfr all together but complaining about not having lfr and saying “guess ill play classic/tbc era again” when it also doesnt have lfr is just wild to me, if you all want lfr you gotta show blizzard with your wallet, unsub
My car does not have LFR …what is your point?
You are aware that neither vanilla or tbc have raid finder right?
Are you that unaware of what his statement means? Really?
“No LFR so I will go back to vanilla and TBC which never had LFR” yeah that makes so much sense bro
It means “I’m not getting the experience expected so I will return to versions of the game that actually have the content they’re supposed to”
100% this. I am not sure what that troll replied (they are blocked) with but Breayanna you are 100% spot on.
So, a version of the game without LFR?
No back to a version of the game that has all of the features (or lack of) that are supposed to be there.
But not without changes (see: dual spec)
I’m ok w/no dual spec.
Classic should be 100% exactly what the original game was… otherwise just call it “Classic light”, “kind of classic”, “classic plus”. I’ve always been a fan of just make classic 100% classic… well at least as close as possible. I had to edit this because some trolls were making statements like - same developers, same bugs, same hacks, and all that other nonsense…no features only (and they know this but they do what trolls do, take a word and literally twist it to shape their narrative).
Or what they are actually doing - Mists of Pandaria Reforged. They are making everything worse.
With high ping, disconnects, the same patch cycle, less guides, etc. It’s nearly impossible to get 100% the same thing moreover as it would take much more resources than what they’ve been doing which is using the last patch and reverting the game based on a new version of the game.
The #nochange crowd is simply an impossible task and by one of its biggest defender was mostly a way to prevent any changes as you don’t know if the ones they’ll do will be good or bad not that they thought that all changes were bad. But we’re way beyond this with SoD (SoM and Hardcore) and now H+ that has been a thing since wotlk. I guess if you truly want to pure vanilla experience with no changes era is still the closest but anniversary with its changes has way more people as far as I know.
High Pings, Disconnects = smoke and mirrors - nothing to do classic.
no changes =/= same patch cycle. It means content nothing more. I would have thought a CC member would have known that but apparently not.
Plenty of guides.
once again no changes =/= use the same patch cycle…I am still a bit taken back you even think that is what it means. Do you also think it means using the exact same staff members? Bring back Bobby? Just curious how deep down a rabbit hole you want to go w/this nonsense train of thought.
Rest of your statement I’m not digesting – just more nonsense about nochange crowds asking for things they didn’t ask for.
I already have a guild. It has five people. We were looking forward to doing LFR together as trying to get into a raid is not easy and would take up most of our playing time spamming in looking for group, etc.