https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/11/05/salt-tax-deduction-cap-wealthy-regressive/
“It started a conversation OKAY?!”
This is the single flimsiest nonsense politicians and pundits pull. If the mark is completely missed, the evergreen retreat option is “oh so you see I was being IRONIC and now you’re talking about it so I still win!” It is pathetic coping at best, genuine idiocy and tone-deafness at worst.
Bwahahahahahaha
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
…oh you’re serious??
You need to learn how to read.
Now go reply to your priest quoting some Notorius BIG lyrics as you lay off people or whatever it is you do…
Ah yes. Those pesky white males.
I love it when religious folks bring this into a debate.
What defines “not” religious folks, Cauchy? Just curious…
My comment was directed at Fasc.
Someone who’s “not religious” is someone without religion. I don’t know what " ‘not’ religious" means.
Zipzo made the original claim, not me. It just continues to be hilarious that someone that doesn’t “believe” in free will (as if belief has any bearing in such a world) still talks as if people can agree, decide, or learn/change their mind about anything…
Technically true. Although your answer still doesn’t prove you’re using this terminology accurately.
So you say “religious folks” without any concept of what the opposite of that is?
Why didn’t you just say “not religious?”
I did say that.
No, you quoted “not,” which might indicating you didn’t quite mean “‘not’.”
“You’re funny.” vs. You’re ‘funny’." There’s a distinction.
Funny how everyone else understood what I meant while you continue to obfuscate.
That’s funny. I don’t see any evidence that anyone else is paying attention to us.
Yeah, it’s almost like nobody uses 
s anymore, right?
Fasc doesn’t count.
That’s what he’s most afraid of.
Even if that were true, he’s not the only one. Still disproves your previous assertion and you’re still obfuscating from the fact that you made this statement:
And you have no clue what you’re saying.
What is it that I’m saying, then?
That’s what I asked you.
You mentioned that you knew what a negation meant above. What more do you want?