New mount - Squeakers... Really?

I do advise you look up reviews on the mobile version. Granted it’s from 2014, but it still remains to be a big example of why sometimes, having options isn’t always a good thing.

Their exist other examples too, Battlefront 2 at launch, Overwatch, Sports games, Red Dead Online, etc.

No, it doesn’t effect general gameplay, it effects your experience, which to me, is more valued then simply gameplay.

And to those people who spend hours, customizatiing their toon’s looks to be as perfect as they wanted it to be, to them, vanity items are that special kind of gameplay.

I was asking out of confusion, being curious on how is it the same exact thing.

I wasn’t being snarky there cause i actually don’t know the answer, hence why i asked.

Cause i actually don’t know?? Hence i asked? You ask questions if you don’t know, or curious about something, and that’s what i’m doing here. I’m being serious here when i ask you the question “Can you explain to me how are those two things are the same”? :face_with_raised_eyebrow:

I’l gladly cop to my mistakes and admit i’m not the brightest blub in the shack, and theirs nothing wrong with admitting that. But i can tell you right now that trolling isn’t my goal, and any perceived “trolling”, whether it be me being short fused in my comments (which does happen, whenever i see comments that just rubs me the wrong way. I don’t always take the best approach with comments.), light hearted jabs (like jokes, most of them are unfunny) or heaven forbid, a different or neutral opinion, or even agreeing… Well sorry that feel that way friendo, but i think you need to stop thinking that.

Also, i put “trolling” up in quotes, cause to me, i seen this word overused to a point a meaninglessness.

You don’t know what i want or don’t want, but i will tell you as clearly and concisely as possible to disallow any accidental misinterpretation as possible.

I have the grand expedition yak, i often buy random battle pets and materials off the Auction house, i often go out in the world, grind for gold by doing embrassies, world quests, quests, old raids and dungeons, Sell materials and other things on the AH and doing mission tables. These are the activities i did ingame. Clearly i don’t have problem with grinding gold or putting the effort to get gold in the game, cause i can do it all ingame and ingame only

The problem i have, is if the said thing i want is not ingame and is a Microtransaction, and i have the option to buy with with gold (“free” option) or with money, what makes me not think that the “Free” route isn’t leveraged against me to prod me to go for the paid route? How is it a bad thing to suggest that this mount or anything on the bnet store should be Ingame as actual ingame content?

To suggest they are the same thing as getting it ingame like a regular mount (via by drop rate, buying it from a vendor or earning it) would be incrediablty ingenious of me. I can never imagine equating microtransactions on the same level as actual ingame content.

If you want to quote someone, please provide the quote.

I’ll wait. Let’s see if you can actually support your claim or dig deeper into the shill ditch.

I think its cute. I have to pay month to month. Can’t afford the six month sub. I had a dog named Squeakers. He died last year from old age.

1 Like

Sure thing…

https://blue.mmo-champion.com/topic/1101701-its-officialblizzard-is-hemorrhaging-subs/

That’s the MMO-Champion Blue Tracker. They archive all blue posts. The original post on the forums was deleted.

You’re welcome!

4 Likes

That would be possible if I played the same as you (apparently) do. 8.3 might be totally lackluster, and it wouldn’t affect my game play in the least. I enjoy the fun and relaxation I get from WoW. It’s very much worth my <50 cents/day.

The cool thing about this mount is that players can get it without subscribing. And they don’t even have to wait until some nebulous future date.

And I bet you could do it by playing less than 7 hours a week. You only need two tokens worth of Blizzard Balance (and you’ll have balance left over besides). :grin:

Edit: The mount only costs $25, plus whatever tax your jurisdiction requires Blizz to charge.

1 Like

I think its really cute. I can’t afford the six month sub. Maybe it will change later on. I had a dog named squeakers. I had him for 11 yrs. He went to doggy heaven couple of yrs. ago.

You can buy the mount for $25 from the store. No sub required.

2 Likes

Tinfoil hat time, but it is just a way to bribe you guys through the content drought. Buy that six month pack for the rat? Enjoy farming visions until shadowlands.

Thank the deity that it is available in game, and better yet by performing many different activites.
Gold=token=blizz bucks=mousey!
If it was some in game activity it would have to be easy in order to allow participation and then there’d be the complaints about it being too easy, blah blah blah. :hear_no_evil::speak_no_evil::see_no_evil:

1 Like

Already debunked months ago, but hey, that tinfoil suits you. Matches your goggles.

1 Like

Let me correct this for you…

“Blizzard, you really embarrass what was once was a legendary gaming company.”

I don’t know why people always think Activision are the ones who force Blizzard to do these things, when these decisions come from within Blizzard itself.

I mean you’re right about one thing. Once upon a time is accurate, because what you just posted is a really bad fairy tale.

2 Likes

I have absolutely zero problems with microtransactions, so long as they don’t effect gameplay in such a way as to give paying customers of those microtransactions an unfair gameplay advantage.

Bar, this is a vanity item. If you are going to let you “experience” be this effected by a vanity item that you can use gold to get, while complaining people have the option of buying it… I’m sorry, but perhaps you should re-evaluate your entire relationship with Blizz. Blizz is a company, they want to make money. If you have a problem with this, there are lots of games you may choose from that don’t have microtransactions. Go play one of them? At the end of the day, you are not satisfied with Blizz, and it’s lead to you complaining about a vanity item that you “can” in fact buy using gold. It’s ridiculous really you going on about this.

1 Like

Really convenient for it to show up right now, regardless.

I am not really conspiratorial, though. I don’t buy it, so it doesn’t affect me. I just nurture a tiny little bit of cognitive dissonance for the sake of skepticism.

Didn’t Ion say that because of the enormous amount of complaints about Azerite they had to come up with fix which put them behind on their original release schedule? That would make what your saying completely false.

1 Like

the funny thing is if, IF, they made this an in game mount they’d have put it in pandaria.

And the current buzz with cloak for some is…hey blizzard you are mean for making us go back to old content like pandaria for the cloak.

they can’t win here.

really funny bit is like the pig it will be out over a year and on some 50% sale at some point. If they like farming this much…farm the gold and wait for the sale.

2 Likes

I mean, not really.

The Dreadwake promotion, which was planned 8+ months in advance, was popular, a lot of folks bought 6 month subs for it. When it comes to marketing, if something works, you keep it going and you plan similar promotions in the future.

Which is why there have been other 6 month promotions since then, because the idea of “Hey, sub for 6 months and we’ll give you a mount.” is appealing. This is simply a continuation of it, although they’ve learned since the Dreadwake and made the mounts in the promotions available for purchase from the store without a subscription for those that aren’t interested in a 6 month sub (or can’t afford one).

1 Like

So, behind on schedule means they stop planning ahead.

Makes no sense whatsoever.

Unfortunately.

Don’t engage him, he’ll twist anything you say and it’s honestly not worth it. Let him wallow in his ignorance.

1 Like