If he did mean this, then the word he used was incorrect. He should have said models rather than animations if that was the case.
I sure hope not because thatâd totally ruin the entire point of having a dracthyr.
You mean to tell me Ion âformerly a lawyerâ Hazzikostas said something in an interview that is completely contradicted by the gameâs own files?
https://tenor.com/view/shocker-shocked-futurama-im-shocked-gif-5296191
The whole thing really makes me scratch my head at why they bothered making the Dracthyr as well. Their whole schtick was they by being combined with the Evoker, they were going to be a âplayable dragonâ fantasy.
Plus, they canât even wear armor, which is a HUGE motivator for playing the game.
It doesnât seem like there is a clear, cohesive vision.
The original playable Dracthyr were evoker, but there have been npc Dracthyr of other classes for a while now.
Animations for all classes but DK, druid and monk are allready ingame and can be previewed on both the wowhead dresser and even ingame using the photo mode of the Narcissus addon.
Animation for death strike, dk casting (the famous lich king sword pointing pose), druid casting animations, and some missing animations from other classes like their own original 2 handed sword idle pose, shield guard/slam poses, off hand strikes animations were added on TWW beta patch and can be previewed on the Beta version of the wowhead dresser.
Basically the only classes still missing animations on Dracthyr are DH and Monk.
1 Like
Not really, the visage forms of the dracthyr are still different from the blood elf/human models
The evokers should be able to do it too because it doesnât take away from people who like the dragons (all 3 of them lol)
As long as we have the choice of which form to use Iâm all for it. But if they force non Evokers to be in Visage form most of the time, and in combat, I will be super disappointed. Probably wonât bother making one.
Iâm going to make a dracthyr monk once Iâm able to or on the off chance they allow it a dracthyr Druid.