Priest is right there, just a hair’s breadth lower than MW, without any z axis port or crazy mobility.
There’s also all the dps specs (druid, rogue, hunter, warrior) who have two comparably represented specs that together are more represented than MW monk.
Disc absolutely dominates healing. While they don’t have ports, they do have grip. So… they can still abuse z axis.
Why compare a dps with a healer? Well, let’s do the math.
2618 dps and tanks above 2.4
865 healers above 2.4
3,483 total
8 spots total. 6 for dps and a tank and 2 for heals.
Healers are .2497% of the spots.
Dps/tanks are .7516% of the spots.
So it’s a perfect spread. MW are dominating.
make disc thread
You’re more then welcome to, but know that there are more people that play disc than MW, so disc is going to have a higher number by comparison.
Just out of curiosity, what did I say…. because given this quote here:
It doesn’t seem like you really know.
I didn’t know RoP could hit every enemy player, regardless of where they were positioned - but, of course, I don’t play at any meaningful level, so what do I know.
Brother, you’re the one pulling out the “My rating is bigger than your rating” (and therefore your argument is automatically moot) card.
What?!
What are you even trying to prove?
Are you really surprised about the results of this graph, when MW has almost always been one of the best BG Healers? Everybody knew they were going to be top-dog in RBGBs (barring some unforeseen change to MW) - which is probably why so many people keen on playing a Healer in RBGBs rolled a MW back at the end of DF. Are you just figuring this out now, halfway through S1?
At any rate, it’s a moot point. Nobody is arguing about how strong MW is (in RBGBs). I think most people are in agreement that MW is strong (in RBGBs). The thread title (a thread you started, mind you) was about MW FC. I was led to believe that was what we were discussing, not just general griping about MW. So what does this graph prove? How does it - in any way - support your arguments about MW FC?
Here… I got a graph for you, too - and it’s just as relevant:
Sure.
This couldn’t be further from the truth. Now if you wanted to say r.sham or priest, sure. A good dk can almost take a priest out of the game.
I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re trolling some here, but a ring can stop an entire group in a tunnel, ramp, gate, w/e. So yes, a monk could prevent an entire team from catching them and they do.
If you want to mock people, be ready for them to reapply in kind. I’m all for being civil, but you tossed that out pretty quickly. So, I’ll just call you out exactly as you are.
You said a single dk or rogue could stop a MW. Pretty ridiculous.
Well, you would have to play in the same range I guess for you to understand that.
What I like is a fair game. You… clearly don’t. A match shouldn’t be almost entirely decided by what map and what healers you get.
I’m sorry, but you’re the first one who brought up rating…
Therefore you imply that you do play at a meaningful level and anyone who doesn’t play at the level that you play should keep their opinions to themselves.
Then you take umbridge at being identified for your elitism. When it is absolutely correct to identify you as an elitist, because you’re attempting to shut down others because they don’t have as high a number as you.
Oh, so being rude and insulting is fine, but can’t talk about something visible to everyone.
If someone wants to be insulting and question my knowledge, I’ll respond in kind. This isn’t complicated. If someone wants to be rude, don’t expect others to be polite.
You are way ruder than Chänx has been.
You’re bad, don’t talk until you get at least as good as me.
Crazy thought, they didn’t need to be rude at all. Weird. If they wanted a discussion, I’m happy to disagree and have some civil back and forth, but they didn’t want that.
Saying someone is whining and acting like a baby for bringing up an issue sets the stage for the conversation. Legitimately, if they want to disagree, then start some dialog. Ask why I think that. Instead, they proceeded to basically say I not only don’t know what I’m talking about, but I also crying about it.
I’m supposed to be polite though? Nah, I’ll respond in exactly the way they are responding to me.
You are playing a team game, you can’t have all the kit and be strong in all possible scenarios, that’s what you have a team for.
And you can’t win every possible game. You’re going to lose some, even if your team plays perfectly.
There are 42 different specs each with different kits.
If you want to play a game where you have equal chance of winning every possible game, you’ve picked the wrong game.
I like a fair game. We all know that you don’t.
When the outcome of a match is predominantly decided by the team comp and not player ability, I don’t think that’s fair.
Yea man, again, I get it. You love stacking matches so you win. Obviously this is right in line with who you are as a person. You hate fair.
You won’t get a fair game unless the game has all 42 specs on both sides at all times.
You’ve picked the wrong game, you’d be better off playing something like CoD.
Nah, you’re wrong. The developers actively try to make the game fair. Every patch we see them making changes to make sure the game is fair. It’s unfortunate that players like you hate fair.
No, they try to balance things, that doesn’t mean that the game is fair in all possible scenarios.
Rock-paper-scissors is balanced, but if you only play rock you’ll never win if the opponent only plays paper.
Fair is an outcome of balance. Glad we had this discussion.
But if we were playing rock-paper-scissors, you’d be here complaining that it isn’t fair that paper always beats rock.
Rock should have the ability to sometimes have sharp edges, paper should sometimes be wet. Nerf paper.
lol
You’re trying so hard man. No, that’s clearly a fair game because both players have an equal chance of winning.
Not if one only plays paper and the other only plays rock.
Then that wouldn’t be rock, paper, scissors. it would be rock and paper. Congrats.