To illustrate that you have no idea why action was taken against that player 
Thereās that fallacy fallacy.
Or what action. At the moment they say they will just be sending warnings.
1 Like
Could have been a warning. Itās just weird the multiboxer is the only report out of all the bots to actually get some kind of confirmation from blizz.
Ok, but you still have no idea why that player was actioned.
1 Like
Well I mean they immediately started attacking me when I rooted all of them so maybe not botting.
It is probably random. Iāve reported bots, names, racist talk, etc. Over the years. I know some of the people were banned, suspended, but never received a confirmation from Blizzard. Maybe if you are the first one you get a confirmation
If you attack me when Iām multiboxing Iām not going to fight back, I donāt like pvp 
I promise Iām not botting lol
1 Like
Seriously using the fallacy fallacy is a really bad habit.
especially since you cant auto casts 5 accounts anymore
Actually I can, I just canāt use software to do it 
Iāll assume by autocast you mean āone keypress to multiple clientsā
Did you go to make a sandwich? Can I have one? Iāll need 5 actually 
1 Like
I like PvP, instanced at least. But only because it really seems to irritate the horde, especially Orcs and Taurens 
, when they fall to a Gnome.
You make some valid points. Multiboxing is going to continue to be a problem. Blizzard needs to adjust the game such that multiboxing provides little to no advantage in any capacity.
What are your ideas?
Donāt think that is possible without totally banning multi-boxing. If nothing else just having some alts on follow while leveling is an advantage. I always make sure I play characters with different professions when leveling so I donāt waste resources, nodes, etc.
Iām staying subbed just so I can be here when multiboxing is banned for good.
This is the anecdotal fallacy. Looking at every point youāve argued so far is starting to show fallacies. Do you try to win arguments with fallacy?
Good deal, then multi-boxing is having a positive effect and Blizzard is making more money. Thank you for your support.
2 Likes
I donāt know of any fallacies
Google says
The Anecdotal Fallacy is committed when a recent memory, a striking anecdote , or a news story of an unusual event leads one to overestimate the probability of that type of event, especially when one has access to better evidence.
I donāt see myself doing that in my post. Iām only saying Iām not botting, not that no one is botting. Is there a reason youāre focusing on fallacies now?
1 Like
It is cheating. Youāre exploiting the game to receive an item at a higher chance than other players. Paying for each account? Thatās pay to win. Nothing you can say will make multi-boxing sound like a good thing.
1 Like