I also have two accounts (only one currently active but I could activate the other quickly).
I have dual boxed (during classic / The Boring Crusade I ran two mages using keyclone plus) in the past, it was fun but it was a lot of work and ended up being quicker to level each character separate.
You might want to try communicating in complete sentences and use capitalization and punctuation if you want to make people think youâre not a 6 year old.
This is completely untrue. Iâm manually playing 3 Paladins in 3 windows on 3 monitors and having a blast doing it. Iâve cleared Wailing Caverns, Deadmines, Shadowfang Keep, Blackfathom Deeps, the Stockade and Razorfen Kraul, and Iâm currently coming up with strats while I level up for 3-man Scarlet Monastery (running out for explosions and whirlwind on multiple characters is the current concern).
1 Like
That was such an illogical response I donât even know how to respond.
1 Like
Must suck to be living paycheck to paycheck
Logic never was your strong point, now was it?
It is, which is why these forums are so frustrating.
Itâs pretty straightforward.
1 person -> pays money -> has power of more than 1 person.
Youâre only defending this cause Bliz says itâs ok.
1 Like
Has more characters than another player, that is all.
A group of players will decimate a multiboxer.
Ok if this is no problem then why canât I log in to all my toons at the same time?
Ive seen enough multiboxers to know thatâs not a fact.
Idc that much since I donât really see multiboxers that often. But I think thatâs the only reason itâs allowed, if they were common more people would cry foul.
1 Like
I agree except for this part.
People donât multibox not because they canât afford it, but because itâs a dumb way to play a game where youâre suppose to be one person among many. Why would I want to control 5 warlocks?
Multi boxers are scummy people like botters. Ban those clowns
It is actually quite fun and a challenge to get it working right. Itâs not an easy process but it is a fun process.
1 Like
And how may groups (equal size ) have you seen go against a multiboxer ? Most see a multiboxer kill a single player (duh 5v1 the 5 will win no matter what) and that is their âproofâ that a group canât kill a multiboxer. 5v5 multiboxer loses (may lose one or two on the other side but if you use even some of your skills you will win)
5 players vs 4 players and a multiboxer, who wins?
Regardless the PvP advantage hardly matters. Vast majority of multiboxers are not using it to control multiple characters for PvP, but as a way to buy gold from Blizzard for advantage on their main character.
5 characters vs 6+ characters ⌠the 5 likely will lose.
Again , you are focusing on the players not the characters.
Using your example if it was 9 individually controlled characters would you expect the 5 to win ?
Considering WoW classic doesnât currently have battlegrounds and wonât for a long time, whatâs relevant is the number of real players rather than characters.
Multibox obviously isnât an advantage in BGs.
Incorrect.
If you attack a group of characters that is a larger number than you (1 or many) you have no right to complain when they destroy you.
1 Like
Where did the bad multi-boxer touch you, OP?
1 Like
Multiboxing is not pay to win. Blizzard has pretty much said its allowable, (look up their old blue posts on this), and have said so long as you are paying for separate accounts, it can be allowed. There is nothing wrong with it.
Blizzard disagrees. Next thread please.
Youâre missing the point. The fact that youâre saying it takes 5 human players to take on 1 human player says it all.
And Iâve seen a Druid sit in Stormshield for a good hour during WoD. Impossible to kill due to HoTs and all he had to do was moonfire people. I was a Shaman and even when I split him apart with the knockback it wasnât enough.