Multiboxing griefing

I agree, we also need to do something about 120s killing me in Westfall at level 20 :slight_smile:

7 Likes

Blizzard doesn’t think so. I defer to their definition than yours

2 Likes

Eventually it will turn into World of Multiboxing. Multiboxing are cheaters and nothing will change my mind.

What happened from 12 Druid is perfect example.

4 Likes

Feel free to do that. Ill use my god given right to respectfully disagree with you and Blizzard and kindly request them to reconsider.

1 Like

Multiboxing is not cheating, and nothing will change my mind.

What happened to me in westfall is perfect example :slight_smile:

3 Likes

Of course they can. They may even. But until that day comes, mboxing is not against the rules, it is not cheating, it is not automation. It is a gameplay system that is permitted by the people who have the right to do the permitting.

Blizzard indicated they were removing flight from the game, in order to promote who-knows-what play purposes. The outrage was huge and they changed their minds. You’d probably get a very similar response if they indicated they were removing mboxing. Not only would all those extra accounts (and subscriptions and expansion packs) disappear, but the players’ own accounts probably would as well. There are a lot of games out there now, and a few very good ones on the horizon. I doubt very much if they would do themselves that much damage for no good reason.

It’s not automation though. Each character is performing a single action in response to a single button press. And if you go AFK, they don’t do anything on their own. The software isn’t creating any new commands. Which is the crucial difference between multiboxing and botting.

So you either have a raid group in one area or a multiboxer in one spot. That leaves the vast majority of the zone to be unbalanced.

It makes absolute sense. You’re the one who has redefined “automation” so broadly that it applies to anyone with a computer. Don’t blame me because I"m taking your argument to it’s only logical conclusion.

You need software to send button presses to each client window. But you also need software to send button presses even if you’re only using one client window. Therefore, according to you, that means everyone who plays the game is a cheater.

So now you’re using “it’s an MMORPG” as a cudgel for any play styles you don’t like.

6 Likes

Hi Rankin, seems to be multiboxing thread day lol

1 Like

They certainly would, unless they had a solution for what to do about the characters on players accounts. Brute force getting rid of multiboxing means that all the characters a player has invested time in get removed for (at one time) legitimate play. Now you can dislike mboxing all you want, but you know that them trying to just get rid of players characters will cause a huge :poop: storm lol

1 Like

Get in the ring. Ding ding

Not against TOS though. Blizzard is fine with it. You should be too.

2 Likes

Which brings us back to what we all know. Blizzard is mainly keeping these multiboxers alive for business purposes. Although if multiboxers were truly that large a part of the community that would mean that blizzards hidden numbers and time played metrics are truly just loads of multiboxing accounts artificially increasing the player count and time played to sell to investors. Which now that you mention it might be something to keep in mind when investing.

They call it the automobile because it automates movement. “But its not automation because if I dont click the gas and all these other things it wont move”. Sorry sir. Its still called an automobile even though you are mostly just broadcasting what you want the machine to do. Add 39 other cars that do the same exact thing that you do as you do it then it certainly is automation of automobiles.

The game expects raid groups to fight other players. I doubt it accounts for multiboxers thus leaving a greater imbalance with multiboxers.

Argument distortion is not an argument.

Again misrepresenting another persons words just show your lack of ability to make your own argument.

Should I feel bad about using the games genre of having people as an argument against Automated drones of players? I dont think so. Players make the game great not player drone armies that get their automated actions from one person broadcasting actions across multiple clients to duplicate one keystroke to produce 40 actions.

2 Likes

Ok then, as long as you are fine with multiboxing :smiley:

2 Likes

DIfference is…ganking isn’t cheating.

2 Likes

Far worse crime, GRIEFING!

2 Likes

In a world where people can think for themselves I motivate people to do so. There was a time where Blizzard allowed people to master loot also. It was not against the tos so people did it. Now its impossible due to a change of direction. We need another change of direction and this time towards multiboxing.

2 Likes

Oh no my dude. I’m on your side 100%. Multiboxing is cheating and the rules need to be updated.

Edit: I was responding to him saying that griefing and ganking him leveling is an issue but it isn’t against TOS.

2 Likes

Ganking lowbies is griefing, the rules should be updated!

2 Likes

Stretch Armstrong much?

3 Likes

Ty for clarifying. This is why I try to be respectful with all. I dont always know where things are directed but wish you well. Thanks.

Not even.

1 Like